2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-com.2017.0131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secrecy performance analysis of SIMO underlay cognitive radio systems with outdated CSI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It's the most direct application of probability theory in engineering. 3 Noise is a classic random process, and it is very important to minimize the probability of a bit or message being received in error due to that noise. 4 If the noise is Gaussian, as it usually is, and the modem is using a "coherent" binary scheme without error correction, then the probability of a given bit being in error is simply the area under some portion of the normal (Gaussian or "bell") curve that depends on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).…”
Section: Probability Density Functions In Engineering Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It's the most direct application of probability theory in engineering. 3 Noise is a classic random process, and it is very important to minimize the probability of a bit or message being received in error due to that noise. 4 If the noise is Gaussian, as it usually is, and the modem is using a "coherent" binary scheme without error correction, then the probability of a given bit being in error is simply the area under some portion of the normal (Gaussian or "bell") curve that depends on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).…”
Section: Probability Density Functions In Engineering Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that all the channels within the network are subjected to Rayleigh fading distribution with the average channel power gains of Ω 1 and Ω 2 for MU and PU, respectively. The channel fading with estimation error between the AP‐to‐MU can be defined as 4,25 hfalse~1=ρh1+1ρψ, where h 1 is the channel gain between the AP and the MU, ψ is the estimation error having the same complex Gaussian distribution as h 1 , and ρ denotes the power correlation coefficient with value 0 ≤ ρ ≤ 1. However, due to the noise and the signal distortion or delay of channel estimation, it is difficult to obtain the ideal CSI from MU in most of practical scenes.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When SC is employed at the MU, the combiner power gain can be defined as XSC=maxk{}1,2Nhfalse~12. The PDF for the scheme can thus be expressed as 4,28 fSCx=falsefalsek=0N1ξkΩ1expnormalxnormalμΩ1, where {normalξ()k=N1k()N1k()1ρϕϕ=ρ1ρ+k+1μ=11ρρϕ1ρ2. …”
Section: Channel and Mobility Statistical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations