2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.03.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondhand Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Neuromotor Function in Rural Children

Abstract: Objectives To investigate the relationship between secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) exposure and neuromotor function in children. Study design We studied 404 children aged 7–9 years who were exposed to SHS and other environmental neurotoxicants. Parent reported smoking habits, and serum cotinine levels were measured in children to determine SHS exposure. Halstead-Reitan Finger Oscillation Test (HRFOT), Purdue Grooved Pegboard Test – Kiddie version (PGPT), and Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2-Sho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, there might be residual or unmeasured confounding in the relationships between Mn exposure and neuromotor outcomes. For example, although none of these adolescents were smokers themselves, comprehensive information on their secondhand smoke exposure (which may be associated with neuromotor function (Yeramaneni et al, 2015)) was not available. Nonetheless, while it is not clear how secondhand smoke may also be associated with our exposure of interest (i.e., prenatal and childhood Mn exposure), which is another criterion for a variable to be a confounder, our analysis did control for SES index (which had previously been linked to secondhand smoke exposure (Orton et al, 2014)) and may in part account for the potential confounding even if it exists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, there might be residual or unmeasured confounding in the relationships between Mn exposure and neuromotor outcomes. For example, although none of these adolescents were smokers themselves, comprehensive information on their secondhand smoke exposure (which may be associated with neuromotor function (Yeramaneni et al, 2015)) was not available. Nonetheless, while it is not clear how secondhand smoke may also be associated with our exposure of interest (i.e., prenatal and childhood Mn exposure), which is another criterion for a variable to be a confounder, our analysis did control for SES index (which had previously been linked to secondhand smoke exposure (Orton et al, 2014)) and may in part account for the potential confounding even if it exists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adverse respiratory and carcinogenic effects of second-hand and, increasingly, third-hand smoke continues to concern public health officials as an avoidable environmental exposure indoors for children (both pre- and postnatal exposures) that lead to lung cancer, motor impairment, hearing and vision problems, cardiovascular consequences, and learning disabilities [37,38,39]. Disparities in exposures continue to exist, where children from minority backgrounds and those in low socio-economic groups experience higher exposures to second-hand tobacco smoke not only in the United but in other countries [39,40].…”
Section: Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, nicotine may also be deposited on surfaces in cases where ENDS use occurs indoors [15], potentially leading to passive exposure to nicotine and other ENDS aerosol constituents [16,17]. Passive exposure to nicotine may also be associated with developmental impairments in children, such as decreased motor function, [18] lower standardized test scores, [19] and higher risk of developing learning disabilities [20]. Prolonged TSNA exposure has been associated with increased risk of lung and esophageal cancer development in animal models [21,22] and is likely a contributing factor to the increased incidence of adenocarcinoma of the lung in adults over the past two decades [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%