2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10552-010-9673-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondhand smoke exposure in bars and restaurants in Guatemala City: before and after smoking ban evaluation

Abstract: Six months after the implementation of a smoke-free law in Guatemala, nicotine levels were significantly decreased in bars and restaurants and workers' support for the law substantially increased.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from this study are consistent with other research showing that comprehensive smoke-free policies are more effective in reducing SHS exposure than weaker policies that allow for exceptions, whether exposure is based on self-report (Borland et al 2006; Haw and Gruer 2007; Thrasher et al 2010a), air monitoring methods (Navas-Acien et al 2004; Connolly et al 2009; Blanco-Marquizo et al 2010; Callinan et al 2010; Erazo et al 2010; Schoj et al 2010; Semple et al 2010; Barnoya et al 2011; Gotz et al 2011; Nafees et al 2011; López et al 2012) or interviews with key informants (WHO 2009). In our study, this pattern was most evident for restaurants, where reported SHS exposure was generally stable and low across Uruguay (6–9%) and in Mexico City (5–7%), where comprehensive policies were implemented.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The results from this study are consistent with other research showing that comprehensive smoke-free policies are more effective in reducing SHS exposure than weaker policies that allow for exceptions, whether exposure is based on self-report (Borland et al 2006; Haw and Gruer 2007; Thrasher et al 2010a), air monitoring methods (Navas-Acien et al 2004; Connolly et al 2009; Blanco-Marquizo et al 2010; Callinan et al 2010; Erazo et al 2010; Schoj et al 2010; Semple et al 2010; Barnoya et al 2011; Gotz et al 2011; Nafees et al 2011; López et al 2012) or interviews with key informants (WHO 2009). In our study, this pattern was most evident for restaurants, where reported SHS exposure was generally stable and low across Uruguay (6–9%) and in Mexico City (5–7%), where comprehensive policies were implemented.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The dramatic benefits for heart disease and lung cancer burden due to SHS, coupled with the lack of any economic impact on the hospitality industry, have also contributed to the rapid spread of this policy. In Guatemala and Uruguay, smoke-free policies represent a clear example of knowledge translation and evidence-based policymaking in which researchers, tobacco control advocates and policymakers have all worked together to move the issue forward 30 42 43…”
Section: The Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the costs we would not recommend a government-funded smoking cessation medication programme in Guatemala, as it would be more reasonable to focus the limited resources on more cost-effective population-based strategies. As of May 2011, the government has taken only one step in the right direction, a comprehensive smoke-free law 23. Other population-based strategies that have been shown to increase quit attempts and success rates could be implemented (eg, a tobacco quitline, behavioural counselling, taxation).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%