2014
DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary triage in prehospital emergency ambulance services: a systematic review

Abstract: These results suggest that, while secondary triage of these patients is safe, further research is required to determine its most appropriate structure and its effect on ambulance demand.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 There is a movement towards expandedscope EMS, where increased emergency or primary care is delivered onsite, thereby avoiding transport to the ED. [17][18][19] Other innovative ideas of managing low-priority EMS calls include secondary telephone triage 20 , paramedic referral services 21 , and community paramedic models 17 . Either individually or in combinations, the implementation of such innovative programs can allow for EMS services to adapt to the changing health care needs of the population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 There is a movement towards expandedscope EMS, where increased emergency or primary care is delivered onsite, thereby avoiding transport to the ED. [17][18][19] Other innovative ideas of managing low-priority EMS calls include secondary telephone triage 20 , paramedic referral services 21 , and community paramedic models 17 . Either individually or in combinations, the implementation of such innovative programs can allow for EMS services to adapt to the changing health care needs of the population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12, 13] Quality level 1 consisted of prospective studies that studied a clearly defined outcome measure with a random or consecutive sample large enough to have narrow confidence intervals as well as heterogeneous enough to have good generalizability. Quality level 2 was similar to level 1, but was more limited with respect to sample sizes or generalizability.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Our scoping review captured the same articles included in this review by Eastwood et al, with the exception of a descriptive publication that did not report on outcomes. 33 Our review located 15 publications (16 studies), of which the majority reported on EMS dispatch programs that diverted callers to either nurse-advice lines or alternate EMS services (other than standard emergency ambulance dispatch).…”
Section: Alternative To Dispatchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These alternative EMS programs have often developed out of local needs in attempts to better serve their patient population with the resources that are available. 32 While appropriate, this leads to difficulty in understanding what the findings mean in aggregate, and certainly prohibits quantitative pooling in a systematic review. This heterogeneity can also significantly limit the generalizability of the findings to contemporary EMS systems; however, the outcomes used can still be considered for use in modern research and quality projects.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%