2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2014.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary structure assignment for conformationally irregular peptides: Comparison between DSSP, STRIDE and KAKSI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
1
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2005;Martin et al 2005;Oluwatobi Salawu 2016;Parisien and Major 2005;Park et al 2011;Richards and Kundrot 1988;Sklenar et al 1989;Zacharias and Knapp 2014). They have been defined with various criteria (Offmann et al 2007): the most popular SSAM use backbone hydrogen bonding pattern-based methods (Carter et al 2003;Fodje and Al-Karadaghi 2002;Frishman and Argos 1995;Kabsch and Sander 1983;Zhang and Sagui 2015).…”
Section: Developments In Ppii Structural Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2005;Martin et al 2005;Oluwatobi Salawu 2016;Parisien and Major 2005;Park et al 2011;Richards and Kundrot 1988;Sklenar et al 1989;Zacharias and Knapp 2014). They have been defined with various criteria (Offmann et al 2007): the most popular SSAM use backbone hydrogen bonding pattern-based methods (Carter et al 2003;Fodje and Al-Karadaghi 2002;Frishman and Argos 1995;Kabsch and Sander 1983;Zhang and Sagui 2015).…”
Section: Developments In Ppii Structural Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although DSSP and STRIDE demonstrate excellent agreement for ordered peptide/protein structures, there may be significant differences when they are utilized for the analysis of inherently disordered peptides. 112 Due to the difficulty in accurately assigning a compensatory factor to accommodate these differences, we assumed that the two results were approximately equal for our analysis. Our previously published results with CHARMM36 force field 26 show a higher propensity to sample the -sheet region of conformational space, which is still outside of statically significant similarity when compared to CD, but it confirms the AFM dynamic force spectroscopy results that both A(1-40) and its residues 13−23 fragment form stable dimers in most likely antiparallel manner.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The separation between highest and lowest energy groups were: 5.0 kJ•mol -1 , 5.7 kJ•mol -1 , 4.6 kJ•mol -1 , and 4.1 kJ•mol -1 , respectively, AMBER-ILDN, AMBER-ILDN*, AMBER-NMR, and CHARMM22* with a previously published value of 4.1 kJ•mol -1 for CHARMM36 26. Secondary structure analysis was performed using the DSSP method (structures in the figure may have small differences since YASARA uses the STRIDE algorithm) 112. The lowest energy representative structure for AMBER-ILDN force field had a dimerSASA of 72.31 nm 2 with an ISA of 10.10 nm 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of the above datasets, we extract effective protein features as experimental data by using DSSP [5] software to generate the dssp file of each protein strand. And then extract the sequence information and corresponding secondary structure information of the protein sequences from their dssp file.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%