2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary stroke prevention and guideline adherent antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation: Insights from the Gulf Survey of atrial fibrillation events (Gulf SAFE)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have reported that 20–30% of patients admitted to hospitals with stroke and AF with an indication for OACs were taking antiplatelet agents alone until recently [41,42]. In our study, most AF-related stroke patients (95.5%) without atherosclerosis were treated with anticoagulants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have reported that 20–30% of patients admitted to hospitals with stroke and AF with an indication for OACs were taking antiplatelet agents alone until recently [41,42]. In our study, most AF-related stroke patients (95.5%) without atherosclerosis were treated with anticoagulants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Therefore, physicians must carefully compare risks and benefits to determine the specific antithrombotic agent. Characteristically, several physicians are reluctant to prescribe OACs, due to which there are a large number of cases in actual clinical practice where antiplatelet agents have been administered to patients with AF-related stroke and atherosclerotic diseases [41,42]. Nevertheless, no studies have directly compared anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy for secondary prevention of stroke in patients with AF and atherosclerotic diseases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a recent hospital-based study conducted in six Gulf countries reported that nearly half of the patients received guideline non-adherent treatment, with patients receiving over-(25.6%) and undertreatment (25.4%) in similar rates. [66] This study did not consider the HAS-BLED score but omission of OACs were considered appropriate in patients at high risk of stroke when contraindications were reported. A study in Israel also reported undertreatment as high as 62.9%.…”
Section: Middle Eastmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Three studies from the Middle East reported guideline non-adherence. [30,62,66] One study from Iran reported that only 2.5% of patients received guideline non-adherent treatment. [30] Compared to the other two studies [62,66], this study had a lower sample size.…”
Section: Middle Eastmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation