Secondary science teachers' use of laboratory activities: Linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices

Abstract

ABSTRACT:The purpose of this study was to explore how science teachers' epistemological beliefs and teaching goals are related to their use of lab activities. Research questions include (a) What are the teachers' epistemological beliefs pertaining to lab activities? (b) Why do the science teachers use lab activities? (c) How are the teachers' epistemological beliefs and instructional goals related to teaching actions? Two major aspects of epistemologies guided this study: ontological aspect (certainty/diversity of truth) and relational aspect (relationship between the knower and the known). The ontological aspect addresses whether one views knowledge as one certain truth or as tentative multiple truths. The relational aspect addresses whether one views him/herself as a receiver of prescribed knowledge separating self from knowledge construction or as an active meaning maker connecting self to the knowledge construction processes. More sophisticated epistemological beliefs include the acknowledgement of multiple interpretations of the same phenomena and active role of the knower in knowledge construction. Three experienced secondary science teachers were interviewed and observed throughout an academic course. The findings illustrate that a teacher's naïve epistemological beliefs are clearly reflected in the teacher's teaching practices. However, a teacher's sophisticated epistemological beliefs are not always clearly GOALS AND ACTIONS 141connected to the practice. This seems to be related to the necessary negotiation among their epistemological beliefs, teaching contexts, and instructional goals. Ontological and relational beliefs seem to be connected to different facets of teaching practices. Findings indicate that various syntheses of different aspects of epistemological beliefs and instructional goals are linked to teachers' diverse ways of using lab activities. Implications for research and teacher education are discussed.C

‘Risky fun’ or ‘Authentic science’? How teachers’ beliefs influence their practice during a professional development programme on outdoor learning

“…However, their is growing evidence that suggests that the relationship is more complex and beliefs and practice are not always in congruence (Savasci & Berlin, 2012;Karenzou et al, 2013). For example, Kang and Wallace (2004) and Mansour (2013) found that whilst teachers who espoused social constructivist beliefs concerning learning -that is, those who believed that children learned by building on their prior knowledge and through 7 group discussions -were frequently observed using teacher-centred lecturing strategies which are more aligned with teachers holding traditional beliefs.…”

“…Contextual and socio-cultural factors, such as school intake, departmental colleagues, curriculum constraints, and examination demands, have been identified as explanatory factors in the incongruence between a teacher's espoused belief and their practice (Kang and Wallace, 2004;Lumpe, Czerniak, Haney & Beltyukova, 2012;Mansour, 2013).…”

An Examination of the Changes in Science Teaching Orientations and Technology-Enhanced Tools for Student Learning in the Context of Professional Development

“…perceptions about reality) as a helpful vantage point . We considered the range of beliefs teachers might hold about science as extending from naïve realism, where science knowledge is seen as an 'objective' absolute truth mirroring reality and is directly accessible to human senses, to a more sophisticated belief about science as a tentative and evolving truth constructed as human explanations of natural phenomena (Kang & Wallace, 2005). In this more sophisticated belief of science knowledge, human explanations are understood as constructions that rely on multiple theories, coordinated with data derived from variable approaches to scientific inquiry.…”

“…We believe that the difference in the 'knowledge of'/ Vision I goals or purposes is also something that should be considered in relation to other dimensions of science teacher orientations and as such revisit this further as we discuss the coalescence of the different teacher orientation dimensions both within this profile and the others. With respect to those 'units of meaning' we could identify, they were more connected to naïve beliefs about the nature of science grounded in 'right answers' in what seemed more aligned to Kang and Wallace's (2005) description of less sophisticated conceptions of the nature of science as 'objective' absolute truth. When considering the 'unrevealed' beliefs found in Profile 1, it could be that the learning journal prompts did not effectively elicit participants' beliefs about the nature of science, even though a wide range of prompts were used.…”

A science teacher’s complex beliefs about nature of scientific inquiry

“…There are research suggesting a congruency between teachers' beliefs about NOS and their instructional practice (e.g., Bencze, Bowen, & Alsop, 2006;Brickhouse, 1990), while other show no significant relationships between teachers' understanding of NOS and their classroom practice (Bartos & Lederman, 2014;Kang & Wallace, 2005). The latter seemed to be especially true for teachers holding sophisticated views of NOS, but who did not apply it in their teaching practice.…”