2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with major congenital thrombophilia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study conducted on a cohort of 209 patients aimed to evaluate the benefits of DOACs for secondary prophylaxis of TEV in patients diagnosed with thrombophilia compared to a group without this underlying pathology. Following a 20-month follow-up period, the study findings revealed no statistically significant differences in safety and efficacy outcomes between full-dose and reduced-dose DOAC regimens [28]. Thus, in this patient's case, the decision was made to continue the treatment using apixaban at a dosage of 2.5 mg twice daily and double antiaggregant treatment for the first six months after the MI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A study conducted on a cohort of 209 patients aimed to evaluate the benefits of DOACs for secondary prophylaxis of TEV in patients diagnosed with thrombophilia compared to a group without this underlying pathology. Following a 20-month follow-up period, the study findings revealed no statistically significant differences in safety and efficacy outcomes between full-dose and reduced-dose DOAC regimens [28]. Thus, in this patient's case, the decision was made to continue the treatment using apixaban at a dosage of 2.5 mg twice daily and double antiaggregant treatment for the first six months after the MI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%