2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2013.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary Procedures following Thoracic Aortic Stent Grafting in the First 3 Years of the VALOR Test and VALOR II Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the earlier trials started enrollment in 2006 and 2007, there is a certain degree of improvement expected over time. 14 Increased operator experience and proficiency in endovascular repair is associated with better outcomes 6,15 and this also likely benefitted the patients in the Valiant Evo trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the earlier trials started enrollment in 2006 and 2007, there is a certain degree of improvement expected over time. 14 Increased operator experience and proficiency in endovascular repair is associated with better outcomes 6,15 and this also likely benefitted the patients in the Valiant Evo trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] In addition, TEVAR outcomes are continuously improving over time as a result of increased operator experience and evolution of stent graft designs and accompanying equipment. 6 As a result, TEVAR is widely accepted as the standard of care for TAAs. A current limitation for the TEVAR procedure can be the patient's anatomic characteristics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, the VALOR trials for zone 3 repair provide data with 6% of secondary type I endoleaks after 24 months. 21 One explanation for the lack of secondary endoleak occurrence in the literature might be the short follow-up period in their series. 2,5 Three of four patients with secondary type Ia endoleak in our analysis underwent endovascular repair with proximal endograft implantation, two of them successfully.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, it seems surprising that the rate of primary type Ia endoleaks is similar in the literature for zone 3 repair (Evaluation of the Medtronic Vascular Talent Thoracic Stent Graft System for the Treatment of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms [VALOR] trials) and for the complex area in the arch. 21 Thoracic device development is still ongoing, but perfect graft placement in hostile aortic arch in >96% seems to be far away from real-world experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the successor to the Talent Thoracic Stent Graft System (Medtronic), Valiant has been evaluated in a number of critical research studies specifically aimed at elucidating its feasibility, safety, and effectiveness in the thoracic aorta, all with satisfactory results: VALOR II (US IDE for descending thoracic aneurysms, n=160) [44,45], VIRTUE (European registry for all types of TBADs, n=100) [46–48], the VALIANT CAPTIVIA registry (mid- to high-risk all-comer cohort, n=100) [28], the RESCUE trial (blunt thoracic aortic injury, n=50) [49,50], and the Valiant Mona LSA first-in-human feasibility trial using a modified Valiant Captivia System with branching to allow LSA patency (US FDA IDE via the new Innovation Pathway, n=9) [51]. The VIRTUE registry was a prospective cohort study comparing 3 groups of TBADs: complicated acute (n=50), subacute (n=24), and chronic (n=26).…”
Section: The Us Dissection Trial 3-year Results Of Valiant Captivia Fmentioning
confidence: 99%