2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary particle formation in seeded suspension polymerization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) comparing with the morphologies developed upon synthesis of the bead consisting from a random poly(St-co-MMA) [17] or PS/PMMA core/shell [3]. The morphologies depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Copolymer Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3) comparing with the morphologies developed upon synthesis of the bead consisting from a random poly(St-co-MMA) [17] or PS/PMMA core/shell [3]. The morphologies depicted in Fig.…”
Section: Copolymer Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important product of suspension polymerization processes is expandable beads, which find applications in many fields such as packaging industry and metal casting technology [1][2][3][4]. Attempts made to find new polymerization methods for producing high quality and selective products led to emersion of seeded polymerization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…91,92 More noticeably, the generic processes also can provide polymer particles with more complex morphologies (e.g. 5 porous particles) and more functions.…”
Section: Suspension Polymerizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Average molar masses were determined by Gel Permeation Chromatography (GPC) using tetrahydrofuran as eluent at 1 mL/min and a refraction index detector. Calibration curve was obtained using polystyrene standards from 580 to 3,800,000 g/mol (GONÇALVES et al, 2009). Logarithmic conversion was used in order to linearize the data and also to compare the values found to those presented by Nijenhuis, Grijpma and Pennings (1992).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%