2003
DOI: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary intervention following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: A single centre experience

Abstract: Technical failure rates were significantly higher in our earlier experience. Open repair, which was a feature of our early experience, has been avoided over the final 3 years. Instead, endoluminal techniques were used without further morbidity or mortality. Aneurysm rupture has not so far been experienced in this experience.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(27 reference statements)
2
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Endovascular correction or conversion is determined to be the method of choice for most EVAR complications repair 7,9,[11][12][13][14][15] . The concept of having a "tool-box" con- .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Endovascular correction or conversion is determined to be the method of choice for most EVAR complications repair 7,9,[11][12][13][14][15] . The concept of having a "tool-box" con- .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgical repair is thus indicated where endovascular repair is impossible or where it has failed 16 . Some reports present more frequently surgical procedures (as the technically easier option) used for complications solution early in their EVAR experience in contrast to later periods 9 . We preferred endovascular correction or conversion procedures, which, when indicated were mostly successful [23][24][25][26] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations