1965
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.140.a1407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary-Electron Emission from Molybdenum Due to Positive and Negative Ions of Atmospheric Gases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
4

Year Published

1968
1968
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
14
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For potential emission, a higher ionization energy is expected to give a higher yield, which is consistent with the results in figure 8 since I + has a higher ionization threshold than I + 2 . Similar behavior has been seen previously with atomic and diatomic nitrogen and oxygen ions 33 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…For potential emission, a higher ionization energy is expected to give a higher yield, which is consistent with the results in figure 8 since I + has a higher ionization threshold than I + 2 . Similar behavior has been seen previously with atomic and diatomic nitrogen and oxygen ions 33 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…where k is the proportionality constant and depends on the apparatus condition, j is the target ion for measurement, I (i) is the intensity of the current for ions j, T is the temperature of Knudsen cell during measuring, σ(i) is the ionization cross-section, γ is the isotope abundance ratio for ions j, S is the relative multiplier gain of the detector for ions j(∝m −1/2 [15]), and ΔE is the difference between the appearance potential for ions j and the electron beam energy for ionizations. The maximum ionization cross-sections, appearance potentials and isotope abundance ratios are listed in Table 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the trends in current vs. voltage for both pure argon and Ar/(10%)O 2 indicate a nearly linear relationship for energies above 1.2 keV (slightly higher in pure argon), before leveling off at low energies. This type of behavior is similar to ion-induced secondary electron yield measurements over energies commensurate with the applied cathode bias [24]. For yield measurements, it is argued that the emission mechanism at low energies will have a contribution from potential effects, which only requires that the incoming ion's ionization potential (E ip ) is at least twice the target work function (ϕ) and thus has no kinetic energy threshold.…”
Section: Cathode Current Vs Applied Voltagementioning
confidence: 59%