1996
DOI: 10.1177/105268469600600102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary Department Chair Roles: Ambiguity and Change in Systemic Reform

Abstract: Systemic reform initiatives, while concerned with school leadership roles, have overlooked the potential role of secondary department chairpersons in the change process. This study examines department chair and teacher perceptions of department chair responsibilities in the context of state-mandated systemic reform. What emerges is a distinct lack of consensus about the appropriate department chair role among the chairs themselves as well as among teachers. Teachers have identified specific types of support th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, previous studies related to PLCs have frequently used mathematics and language departments as objects of research (Lomos et al, 2011). Furthermore, mathematics and language teachers have previously been found to consider consultation with subject colleagues to be very important (van Veen et al, 2001), and heads of language and mathematics departments have reported a strong inclination toward facilitation and instructional leadership, rather than emphasizing their administrative role (Bliss, Fahrney, & Steffy, 1996). In addition, these subjects have a high ratio of full-time staff in Flanders, which tends to supports stronger departmental practices (Turner & Bolam, 1998).…”
Section: Background and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, previous studies related to PLCs have frequently used mathematics and language departments as objects of research (Lomos et al, 2011). Furthermore, mathematics and language teachers have previously been found to consider consultation with subject colleagues to be very important (van Veen et al, 2001), and heads of language and mathematics departments have reported a strong inclination toward facilitation and instructional leadership, rather than emphasizing their administrative role (Bliss, Fahrney, & Steffy, 1996). In addition, these subjects have a high ratio of full-time staff in Flanders, which tends to supports stronger departmental practices (Turner & Bolam, 1998).…”
Section: Background and Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oftentimes, department chairs report that they should be focusing on instructional leadership but lack the time and resources for these activities (Adduci, 1990;Bliss, Fahrney, & Steffy, 1995;Zepeda & Kruskamp, 2007). Departmental members also report frustration over the lack of instructional support provided by department chairs, going as far as to describe this lack of instructional support as the largest need not met by chairs (Bliss et al, 1995).…”
Section: Defining the Role Of Department Chairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the concept of role ambiguity has historically been a theme in some of the literature on secondary school department chairs (Bliss et al, 1996;Mayers & Zepeda, 2002;Weller, 2001;Zepeda & Kruskamp, 2007), more recent discussion has suggested role ambiguity is not nearly as relevant anymore because it has been addressed in part through standardizing role descriptions. It is not an issue at the present time because of the established guidelines that emphasize role standardization (see NAIS Guidelines of Professional Practice for Department Chairs, 2011; National Education Association, 2020).…”
Section: Standards For Teacher Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the concept of role ambiguity is reevaluated in this study because this concept was historically a topic in the literature on secondary school department leaders (Bliss et al, 1996;Mayers & Zepeda, 2002). Role ambiguity means that the department leader may have substantially different roles depending on the school and so there can be a lack of clarity for this type of leadership position.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%