Objective-Outcome prediction is challenging in comatose post-cardiac arrest survivors. We assessed the feasibility and prognostic utility of brain diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) during the first week.Corresponding Author Christine AC Wijman, MD, PhD, Stanford Stroke Center, 701 Welch Road, B325, Palo Alto, CA 94304, Fax: (650) Tel: (650)
NIH-PA Author ManuscriptNIH-PA Author Manuscript
NIH-PA Author ManuscriptMethods-Consecutive comatose post-cardiac arrest patients were prospectively enrolled. MRI data of patients who met predefined specific prognostic criteria were used to determine distinguishing ADC thresholds. Group 1: death at 6 months and absent motor response or absent pupillary reflexes or bilateral absent cortical responses at 72 hours, or vegetative at 1 month. Group 2A: Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) score of 4 or 5 at 6 months. Group 2B: GOS of 3 at 6 months. The percentage of voxels below different apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) thresholds was calculated at 50 × 10 −6 mm 2 /sec intervals.Results-Overall, 86% of patients underwent MR imaging. Fifty-one patients with 62 brain MRIs were included in the analyses. Forty patients met the specific prognostic criteria. The percentage of brain volume with an ADC value below 650-700 × 10 −6 mm 2 /sec best differentiated between group 1 and groups 2A and 2B combined (p<0.001), while the 400-450 × 10 −6 mm 2 /sec threshold best differentiated between groups 2A and 2B (p=0.003). The ideal time window for prognostication using DWI was between 49 to 108 hours after the arrest. When comparing MRI in this time window with the 72 hour neurological examination MRI improved the sensitivity for predicting poor outcome by 38% while maintaining 100% specificity (p=0.021).Interpretation-Quantitative DWI in comatose post-cardiac arrest survivors holds great promise as a prognostic adjunct.Approximately 350,000 cardiac arrests occur annually in the United States1. Up to half of these patients are successfully resuscitated. In the past, only 10% to 30% of comatose postcardiac arrest patients had good functional recovery. These numbers will likely improve with the increasing use of therapeutic hypothermia2 , 3.Post-cardiac arrest brain injury is a common cause of morbidity and mortality. Many comatose post-cardiac arrest patients die or survive with severe disability after a prolonged intensive care unit stay associated with a tremendous cost burden4 , 5. Conversely, the potential for premature withdrawal of life support from patients who may have a chance of functional recovery represents an additional ethical dilemma. Thus, early accurate identification of patients who have no likelihood of meaningful recovery is a very important health care issue.Although several prognostic variables have been studied in comatose post-cardiac arrest patients, the currently accepted variables (neurological examination, neurophysiologic tests, and serum markers) have substantive limitations. First, they identify only a subset of poor outcome patients with high specificity. Se...