2006
DOI: 10.1508/cytologia.71.149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary Chromosome Associations in <i>Ocimum</i> spp.

Abstract: Summary Secondary association of chromosomes at metaphase I was noted in 61.94%, 60.00%, 50.38% and 21.74% meiocytes of Ocimum tenuiflorum-green type (2nϭ36), O. gratissimum (2nϭ40), O. canum (2nϭ26) and O. kilimandscharicum (2nϭ76) respectively. Secondary polyploidy has been attributed as the possible cause of secondary association of chromosomes and statistical analysis of cytological data revealed that the basic chromosome number in the species is 12 (xϭ6 for O. canum) with probable origin from xϭ6 through … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
5
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In O. tenuiflorum (Green form), 2n=36 chromosomes were also reported earlier (Mukherjee and Datta 2006). Thus the present report correlates to the earlier findings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In O. tenuiflorum (Green form), 2n=36 chromosomes were also reported earlier (Mukherjee and Datta 2006). Thus the present report correlates to the earlier findings.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For instance, chromosome numbers of 2n = 32, 2n = 36 and 2n = 76 have been reported for O. tenuiflorum L. with basic number of eight (mukherjee et al, 2005 and 72), O. basilicum L. (2n = 48) and O. kilimandscharicum Guerke (2n = 76), etc. (soBti & PushPangadan, 1977;mukherjee & datta, 2006). Infrageneric classification made by Paton et al (1999) is the presently accepted infrageneric structuring of the genus, based on parsimony analysis of the morphological variations of the genus and close relatives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few to many groups of cells exhibited cytomixis in P 1 , P 4 and P 7 thereby indicating that meiocytes either vary in their cytomictic potential or fail to get exposed to the specific condition(s) required to trigger the process. Datta et al (2005) were of the opinion that those cell clusters formed during early microsporogenesis and persisted during the process of meiosis may have signalled the phenomenon of cytomixis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%