Secondary Artisan–Verysise aphakic lens implantation

Güell, José L.; Velasco, Fortino; Malecaze, François; Vázquez, Mercedes; Gris, Óscar; Manero, Felicidad

doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.06.047

Cited by 84 publications

(84 citation statements)

References 25 publications

(22 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Severe hyperopia developed in only one eye. However, postoperative refractive error was more than previous reports of either Artisan IOL 1,7,12 or iris fixated PCIOL. 13 One reason might be inaccurate keratometry in most of our cases due to irregular astigmatism caused by previous repaired corneoscleral laceration.…”

Section: Complicationscontrasting

confidence: 60%

“…Except The Artisan IOL have been used safely for secondary implantation in adults and children with aphakia. 1,7,[9][10][11][12] They have also been used after traumatic injuries to the globe. [9][10][11][12] Gü ell et al 7 reported satisfactory results of Artisan IOL implantations in 16 aphakic patients.…”

Section: Complicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…They are easy to place and are associated with a good visual outcome and a low incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications. 6 Many reported cases of Artisan IOL implantation have had good clinical outcomes 1,[7][8][9][10][11] ; however, despite more than 10 years of favourable clinical experience with this IOL, experience in the literature with implantation of this lens in aphakic and vitrectomized eyes secondary to trauma is scarce. Insertion of Artisan IOL in an eye without vitreous poses challenges, especially when a large incision is required.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Secondary Artisan–Verysise intraocular lens implantation for aphakic correction in post-traumatic vitrectomized eye

Riazi

Moghimi

Najmi

et al. 2008

Eye

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Artisan-Verysise intraocular lens (IOL) secondarily implanted for aphakic correction in post-traumatic vitrectomized eyes. Methods Postoperative outcomes of secondary implantation of an iris-supported Artisan IOL in 17 unilateral aphakic patients with previous pars plana vitrectomy secondary to posterior segment trauma were evaluated prospectively. Eyes had vitrectomized in previous 6-60 months. After complete ophthalmologic examination, IOL implantation was performed through a scleral tunnel incision. Patients were followed for visual outcome, endothelial cell density (ECD) and occurrence of complications. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), spherical equivalents (SE), and ECD were compared before and after IOL insertion. Conclusion Secondary Artisan IOL implantation is an effective and safe procedure to correct aphakia in vitrectomized eyes without capsular support after trauma. Considering good visual rehabilitation and low rate of complications, this procedure is recommended in vitrectomized eyes.

show abstract

Section: Complicationscontrasting

confidence: 60%

Section: Complicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Secondary Artisan–Verysise intraocular lens implantation for aphakic correction in post-traumatic vitrectomized eye

Riazi

Moghimi

Najmi

et al. 2008

Eye

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The results of IOL implantation in the absence of capsule support have been satisfactory in general when viewed with respect to visual results and recovery [9][10][11][15][16][17][18][19][20], although few trials appear to show that anterior chamber IOLs provide a superior visual recovery than scleral-fixated PCIOLs [21][22][23]. The cause for the poorer visual recovery with sclera-fixated PCIOLs is represented by microscope light-induced retinal injuries, due to the prolonged operating time compared with anterior chamber implants [12,24].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Secondary IOL implantation without capsular support. A laser flare cell‐meter study

Bravetti¹,

Leonetti²,

Mandrioli³

et al. 2007

Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Phacoemulsification and the contemporary implantation of intraocular lens (IOL) within the capsular bag represent the standard of care in cataract surgery, but sometimes a primary IOL implant is not possible due to intraoperative complications or preexisting conditions so that a secondary implantation of IOL within the anterior or posterior chamber is necessary. The aim of our study was to assess the degree of inflammation due to a secondary implant of claw lenses, angle-supported IOLs, and scleral-fixated IOLs by means of an objective, repeatable, and noninvasive device, the laser flare cell meter, which evaluates aqueous flare and cells within the anterior chamber in vivo and to show the contribution of the single IOLs to the genesis of inflammation.

show abstract

“…The use of Artisan-Verysise intraocular lens for secondary implantation and correction of aphakia has been estimated to be safe, also achieving a BCVA of 20/40 or better in 37.5% of eyes treated by Güell et al; corneal endothelial cell loss was mainly observed within the first year (7.78%), whereas cystoid macular oedema was diagnosed in two out of a total of 16 patients in a follow-up of at least 3 years (28). A customized PMMA iris print and iris-clipped AC IOL (Ophtec BV) has been proposed to repair aniridia along with correction of aphakia and corneal astigmatism (29).…”

Section: Outcomes and Complications Following Implantation Of Ac Iolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Correction of Aphakia Using Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens

Moschos

Nitoda

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Senile The crystalline lens is a transparent biconvex structure, participating in the refractive system of the eye. Any metabolic disturbance in the lens result in localized or diffuse opacification, called a cataract (1). Senile cataract is the leading cause of severe vision loss and blindness worldwide, affecting approximately 20 million people (2-6). The visual rehabilitation required after cataract surgery is usually treated with aphakic glasses, contact lenses, and intraocular lenses (IOLs), which can be placed in the anterior or posterior chamber (7). The use of anterior chamber IOLs (AC IOLs) for the correction of aphakia was first reported in the 1960s (8, 9). However, this method was abandoned for about 20 years due to the high incidence of complications and the progression of cataract surgery (10). In 1996, AC IOLs were implanted in 1.09% of patients who underwent cataract extractions; this percentage had increased to 43% by 2000 (11). Since the development of AC IOLs, their design has been frequently modified, ultimately changing from a biconcave form to a convex-concave one (12, 13). The latter is designed to protect the corneal endothelium, which is usually vulnerable to lensinduced damage. The indications for the use of AC IOLs include extracapsular cataract extraction with intraoperative complications, intracapsular cataract extraction, secondary implantation and penetrating keratoplasty (11).To our knowledge, this is the first article focusing on aphakic AC IOLs, and reviewing their visual outcome and complications. Outcomes and Complications Following Implantation of AC IOLs in Aphakia

show abstract

Secondary Artisan–Verysise aphakic lens implantation

Abstract: Artisan-Verysise IOL implantation seems a safe, predictable, and effective option for aphakic eyes without capsule support.

Cited by 84 publications

References 25 publications

Secondary Artisan–Verysise intraocular lens implantation for aphakic correction in post-traumatic vitrectomized eye

Secondary Artisan–Verysise intraocular lens implantation for aphakic correction in post-traumatic vitrectomized eye

Secondary IOL implantation without capsular support. A laser flare cell‐meter study

The Correction of Aphakia Using Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About