Adjunct Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3239092.3239099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second Workshop on Trust in the Age of Automated Driving

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the absence of a human driver (i.e., fully automated vehicle), pedestrians took their crossing decision mainly dependent on the distance of the approaching car, which is in line with the findings of prior investigations (Oxley et al, 2005;Yannis et al, 2013;Moore et al, 2019;Dey et al, 2020c;Holländer et al, 2020b). However, we believe that explicit communication has the potential to enhance trust of automated driving and should therefore not be neglected (Noah et al, 2017;Wintersberger et al, 2018;Holländer et al, 2019b). Projections scored second best for intuitive understanding and slightly exceeded the baseline in the point "Low subjective mental workload."…”
Section: Comprehensibilitysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the absence of a human driver (i.e., fully automated vehicle), pedestrians took their crossing decision mainly dependent on the distance of the approaching car, which is in line with the findings of prior investigations (Oxley et al, 2005;Yannis et al, 2013;Moore et al, 2019;Dey et al, 2020c;Holländer et al, 2020b). However, we believe that explicit communication has the potential to enhance trust of automated driving and should therefore not be neglected (Noah et al, 2017;Wintersberger et al, 2018;Holländer et al, 2019b). Projections scored second best for intuitive understanding and slightly exceeded the baseline in the point "Low subjective mental workload."…”
Section: Comprehensibilitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Previous studies have highlighted that safety (objective and subjective), comprehensibility, and usability are decisive factors when evaluating VRU-AV communication concepts (Noah et al, 2017;Wintersberger et al, 2018). To determine which concepts lead to the most optimal results, we aimed to measure these factors through an immersive virtual reality investigation that simulates a realistic first-person view experience.…”
Section: User Studymentioning
confidence: 99%