Proceedings of the Fifth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2043932.2044016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second workshop on information heterogeneity and fusion in recommender systems (HetRec2011)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
164
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
164
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We conducted a user study in which participants, recruited via social networking sites, were presented with sets of movies or musicians (no combinations of both) from the HetRec'11 social tagging datasets [1]. They were requested to freely state which emotions they considered as relevant for each item (movie or musician), thus manually (and collectively) creating emotion-oriented item profiles, which we considered as ground truth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We conducted a user study in which participants, recruited via social networking sites, were presented with sets of movies or musicians (no combinations of both) from the HetRec'11 social tagging datasets [1]. They were requested to freely state which emotions they considered as relevant for each item (movie or musician), thus manually (and collectively) creating emotion-oriented item profiles, which we considered as ground truth.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They generated 713 evaluation cases, assigning an average of 3.30 and 4.18 emotions to items in the movies and music domains, respectively. 1 To evaluate the quality of the emotion-oriented profiles generated by our methods with respect to the ground truth profiles, we compared them by means of the Precision at position k, P@k, which, for a particular item, is defined as the percentage of the top k emotions returned by a method that are relevant for the item, as stated by the users of our study. Table 6 shows average precision values of the different methods and a random emotion ranking method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to Freebase, the UBES system utilizes the usage data of the HetRec2011 MovieLens2k dataset [2]. With a simple heuristic based on IMDb identifiers, more than 10,000 out of 10,197 HetRec2011 movies have been matched to Freebase identifiers (cf.…”
Section: Usage-based Entity Summarization (Ubes)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experimentations we use the MovieLens dataset and IMDb database, which are publicly available [9]. The tests have been performed for: (1) analysing the pertinence of bloom filters in recommender systems, (2) enhancing the usage of a bitwise AND similarity instead of the common vector cosine/jaccard similarities and (3) using a bitwise XNOR similarity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%