2001
DOI: 10.1006/jcht.2001.0829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second virial cross coefficients for (ammonia + water) derived from gas phase excess enthalpy measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow calorimetric apparatus used to make H E m measurements on (water + nitrogen) and (water + oxygen) is almost the same as that previously described [4,5]. The plug-in calorimeter was a single vessel, not a twin arrangement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The flow calorimetric apparatus used to make H E m measurements on (water + nitrogen) and (water + oxygen) is almost the same as that previously described [4,5]. The plug-in calorimeter was a single vessel, not a twin arrangement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A graph showing B ns and B for water over the temperature range (300 to 550) K is shown in figure 3 of reference [5] (curves 5 and 1). In terms of the association model the difference between these two curves is the quantity RT Á K. Values of ln K 1 at T 1 and ln K 2 at T 2 plotted against T À1 at once give the enthalpy of association DH.…”
Section: An Association Model For Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gas phase flow calorimetric apparatus was the same as that described previously (3) and used to make measurements on (steam + ammonia). Again a 'plug in' flow mixing calorimeter (4) was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curve c drawn through the measurements was calculated from Stockmayer potential parameters for ammonia and Kihara potential parameters for cyclohexane using (1 − k 12 ) = 0.92, which best fits both the H E m (B) and therfore the B 12 values. The uncertainty on the values of B 12 is estimated to be ±15 cm 3 ·mol −1 , and the uncertainty on the values of φ 12 is estimated to be Figure 2 also shows the second virial coefficients for ammonia (curve a), benzene (curve e) and cyclohexane (curve f). The B 12 curve for ammonia-cyclohexane (curve c) is only about 30 cm 3 · mol −1 more negative than the curve for ammonia (curve a) because dipole-induced dipole forces between ammonia and cyclohexane are very weak.…”
Section: Second Virial Cross Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%