1969
DOI: 10.1177/00220345690480013001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second Premolar Morphologic Trait Similarities in Twins

Abstract: Seven morphologic traits of the mandibular second premnolars were compared in 32 pairs of like-sexed twins to determine their value in diagnosing twin zygosity. Homolateral comparisons of the mandibular second premolars were accurate enough to be used as an aid in the diagnosis of monozygosity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding gender difference, male had greater values than female including intercuspal distance, mesiodistal diameter, buccolingual diameter, individual cusp area, and total crown area of first and second premolars. These results were consistent with the previous studies, which showed that mandibular first premolar is smaller than second premolar, because first premolar functions along with the canine, while second premolar supports function of mandibular first molar for efficient occlusion [1,[3][4][5][11][12][13][14]. The measurements of the tooth size in Korean were significantly smaller compared to other races [9,17,18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding gender difference, male had greater values than female including intercuspal distance, mesiodistal diameter, buccolingual diameter, individual cusp area, and total crown area of first and second premolars. These results were consistent with the previous studies, which showed that mandibular first premolar is smaller than second premolar, because first premolar functions along with the canine, while second premolar supports function of mandibular first molar for efficient occlusion [1,[3][4][5][11][12][13][14]. The measurements of the tooth size in Korean were significantly smaller compared to other races [9,17,18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although there are many studies regarding tooth morphology from many countries and periods [3][4][5][6][7][8], there is lack of studies on tooth morphology and systematic correlations in Koreans yet. Recent study demonstrated that mandibular molars of Korean have smaller size and more dimorphism than other races [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contra‐lateral human premolars extracted for orthodontic reasons represent an ideal ex vivo set‐up for comparative material analyses, as they are anatomically almost identical (Wood & Green 1969). Consequently, bias caused by differences in root canal anatomy or dentine structure (Vasiliadis et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted by Boraas and co-workers (1988), several genetically controlled factors have previously been identified or implicated to be involved in the susceptibility to dental caries-for example, salivary factors and the oral microflora (Mandel, 1974), tooth eruption patterns (Gedda and Brenci, 1966), tooth morphology (Wood and Green, 1969;Konig, 1963), dental arch shape (Kolmakow and Puranen, 1985), and interdental space dimension (Corruccini and Potter, 1980), as well as nutritional factors (Forrai and Bankovi, 1984). All of these factors warrant detailed study in the future, for it is one thing to know that dental caries experience is a heritable characteristic, but quite another to know how/why this is so, i.e., to understand the biologic mechanisms.…”
Section: Future Of Genetic Research In Caries and Periodontologymentioning
confidence: 99%