1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf02391553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second order theories with ordinals and elementary comprehension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us finish this section by mentioning that it is also possible to provide a direct wellordering proof up to each ordinal less than ipcoO within IDf. For a similar argument the reader is referred to Jager and Strahm [18]. §3.…”
Section: Lemma 2 We Have For All Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us finish this section by mentioning that it is also possible to provide a direct wellordering proof up to each ordinal less than ipcoO within IDf. For a similar argument the reader is referred to Jager and Strahm [18]. §3.…”
Section: Lemma 2 We Have For All Kmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For exactly the same reason, the statement (211) of [12, p. 328] is false and thus the proof of Theorem 3.4.6.15 of [12, p. 328] is flawed as well, which states W-KPl ≤ ψ Ω (Ω ω · ε 0 ), although this statement itself is true as well. 10 We will amend the proof of these two theorems in Section 9.3. As for (NUID 2 ν ) 0 , the third error of [12] lies in the very analysis of KPl r ν , as we also mentioned in Section 1.…”
Section: The Errors In [12]mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In fact, the claim (5) is false and, as we will show in Sections 8,9, the proof-theoretic ordinal of KPl r ν is ψ Ω (Ω ν · ω). 10 In addition to the aforementioned crucial problem, the suggested application of Collapsing Theorem [12,Theorem 3.4.5.3] illustrated in Pohlers's proof of the claim (211) of [12, p. 328] is not generally valid. It is suggested there to infer…”
Section: The Errors In [12]mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The applicative theory TON. The theory TON (total theory of operations and numbers), introduced and studied by Jäger & Strahm (1995), is the total version of the theory BON (basic theory of operations and numbers) introduced by Feferman & Jäger (1993) (see also the textbooks Beeson, 1985 andTroelstra &van Dalen, 1988 which contain presentations of first-order applicative theories). It is formulated in L t , the firstorder language of operations and numbers, comprising of individual variables x, y, z, v, w, f , i, m, n, .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%