Abstract:Using systematic calculations in spinor language, we obtain simple descriptions of the second order symmetry operators for the conformal wave equation, the Dirac-Weyl equation and the Maxwell equation on a curved four-dimensional Lorentzian manifold. The conditions for existence of symmetry operators for the different equations are seen to be related. Computer algebra tools have been developed and used to systematically reduce the equations to a form which allows geometrical interpretation.
“…where the last equation again follows from (61). Now we look at the second term on the right-hand-side of (59): using (61) we get that Then putting (62) and (63) together, for S BCDE ∈ V * ⊗ V (2,1) , finishes the proof. Now assume that D C is the Thomas D-operator and K DE is symmetric such that (64)…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The following lemma will give a formula for the projection P , when restricted to T ⊗ T (2,1) , i.e., applied to S BCDC ∈ T * ⊗ T (2,1) . Lemma 21.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 21. Let P := P (2,2) be the projection of ⊗ 4 T * onto T (2,2) defined above and S BCDC ∈ T * ⊗ T (2,1) . Then For the the third term on the right-hand-side in (59) we compute…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 22. Let D be the Thomas D-operator for a projective structure with curvature W AB C D and let P be the projection from T * ⊗ T (2,1) to T (2,2) . Then K ∈ Γ(T * (2) ) satisfies D (A K BC) = 0, i.e., D A K BC ∈ T (2,1) , if and only if (2,2) .…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a Riemannian manifold (M, g) a tangent vector field k ∈ X(M ) is an infinitesimal automorphism (or symmetry) if the Lie derivative of the metric g in direction of k vanishes. In terms of the Levi-Civita connection ∇ = ∇ g , this may be written as (1) ∇ (a k b) = 0…”
The Killing tensor equation is a first order differential equation on symmetric covariant tensors that generalises to higher rank the usual Killing vector equation on Riemannian manifolds. We view this more generally as an equation on any manifold equipped with an affine connection, and in this setting derive its prolongation to a linear connection. This connection has the property that parallel sections are in 1-1 correspondence with solutions of the Killing equation. Moreover this connection is projectively invariant and is derived entirely using the projectively invariant tractor calculus which reveals also further invariant structures linked to the prolongation.
“…where the last equation again follows from (61). Now we look at the second term on the right-hand-side of (59): using (61) we get that Then putting (62) and (63) together, for S BCDE ∈ V * ⊗ V (2,1) , finishes the proof. Now assume that D C is the Thomas D-operator and K DE is symmetric such that (64)…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The following lemma will give a formula for the projection P , when restricted to T ⊗ T (2,1) , i.e., applied to S BCDC ∈ T * ⊗ T (2,1) . Lemma 21.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lemma 21. Let P := P (2,2) be the projection of ⊗ 4 T * onto T (2,2) defined above and S BCDC ∈ T * ⊗ T (2,1) . Then For the the third term on the right-hand-side in (59) we compute…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 22. Let D be the Thomas D-operator for a projective structure with curvature W AB C D and let P be the projection from T * ⊗ T (2,1) to T (2,2) . Then K ∈ Γ(T * (2) ) satisfies D (A K BC) = 0, i.e., D A K BC ∈ T (2,1) , if and only if (2,2) .…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a Riemannian manifold (M, g) a tangent vector field k ∈ X(M ) is an infinitesimal automorphism (or symmetry) if the Lie derivative of the metric g in direction of k vanishes. In terms of the Levi-Civita connection ∇ = ∇ g , this may be written as (1) ∇ (a k b) = 0…”
The Killing tensor equation is a first order differential equation on symmetric covariant tensors that generalises to higher rank the usual Killing vector equation on Riemannian manifolds. We view this more generally as an equation on any manifold equipped with an affine connection, and in this setting derive its prolongation to a linear connection. This connection has the property that parallel sections are in 1-1 correspondence with solutions of the Killing equation. Moreover this connection is projectively invariant and is derived entirely using the projectively invariant tractor calculus which reveals also further invariant structures linked to the prolongation.
General $$ \mathcal{N} $$
N
= (1, 0) supergravity-matter systems in six dimensions may be described using one of the two fully fledged superspace formulations for conformal supergravity: (i) SU(2) superspace; and (ii) conformal superspace. With motivation to develop rigid supersymmetric field theories in curved space, this paper is devoted to the study of the geometric symmetries of supergravity backgrounds. In particular, we introduce the notion of a conformal Killing spinor superfield ϵα, which proves to generate extended superconformal transformations. Among its cousins are the conformal Killing vector ξa and tensor ζa(n) superfields. The former parametrise conformal isometries of supergravity backgrounds, which in turn yield symmetries of every superconformal field theory. Meanwhile, the conformal Killing tensors of a given background are associated with higher symmetries of the hypermultiplet. By studying the higher symmetries of a non-conformal vector multiplet we introduce the concept of a Killing tensor superfield. We also analyse the problem of computing higher symmetries for the conformal d’Alembertian in curved space and demonstrate that, beyond the first-order case, these operators are defined only on a limited class of backgrounds, including all conformally flat ones.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.