2011
DOI: 10.1080/17455030.2011.626809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-order small perturbation method for transmission from dielectric rough surfaces

Abstract: Although the small perturbation method (SPM) for rough surface scattering has been studied extensively in problems in optics, remote sensing and propagation, there are fewer studies on rough surface transmission by the SPM. In this paper, from Huygens' principle and the extinction theorem, the SPM is used to derive the transmitted field to the second order, and expressions for the bidirectional transmission coefficient and the total surface transmittance to the second order are developed for the random rough s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the unconsidered factors, including surface roughness and subsurface rock fragment, may be the reasons for the departure between simulation and observation. For example, surface roughness on small scales may increase the TB value [53]. Volume scattering and high thermal inertia, due to subsurface rock fragment, can darken the emission [7] and cause unusual physical temperature of lunar surface [54].…”
Section: B Reasons For Tb Difference Between Observation and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the unconsidered factors, including surface roughness and subsurface rock fragment, may be the reasons for the departure between simulation and observation. For example, surface roughness on small scales may increase the TB value [53]. Volume scattering and high thermal inertia, due to subsurface rock fragment, can darken the emission [7] and cause unusual physical temperature of lunar surface [54].…”
Section: B Reasons For Tb Difference Between Observation and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the distribution of local elevations for lunar soil is typically well described by Gaussian statistics [ Helfenstein and Shepard , ], then the lunar surface of small‐scale roughness is assumed Gaussian here, i.e., the Gaussian height distribution and Gaussian autocorrelation function W (⋅), as used in Appendix. We utilize the second‐order SPM to calculate the bidirectional transmission coefficient [ Chen et al ., ] titalicpq12θ1ϕ1θ2ϕ2. It can be divided into zero‐order contribution tp()0θ2cϕ2c, first‐order contribution titalicpp112θ1ϕ1θ2ϕ2 and titalicpq112θ1ϕ1θ2ϕ2, and second‐order contribution tp()2θ2cϕ2c, where θ 2 c , ϕ 2 c correspond to the direction of coherent transmission, determined by k 1 sin θ 1 = k 2 sin θ 2 c , ϕ 2 c = ϕ 1 .…”
Section: Formulation Of the Tb Model For The Lunar Regolithmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expressions of tp()0θ2cϕ2c, tp()2θ2cϕ2c, titalicpp112θ1ϕ1θ2ϕ2, and titalicpq112θ1ϕ1θ2ϕ2 are given in the Appendix, and the derivation is given by Chen et al . [].…”
Section: Formulation Of the Tb Model For The Lunar Regolithmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations