1998
DOI: 10.1007/bf01278496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-order shape sensitivity analysis for nonlinear problems

Abstract: First-and second-order shape sensitivity analyses in a fully nonlinear framework are presented in this paper. Using the fixed domain technique and the adjoint approach, integral expressions over the domain are obtained. The Guillaume-Masmoudi lemma allows these expressions to be rewritten as integrals over the domain boundary. The formalism is then applied to the steady creep of a bar in torsion, as an example of power-law nonlinearities that occur not only in creep problems but also in viscoplastic fluid flow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where Σ ε is the Eshelby energy-momentum tensor (see, for instance, [5,26]) given in this particular case by…”
Section: Shape Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where Σ ε is the Eshelby energy-momentum tensor (see, for instance, [5,26]) given in this particular case by…”
Section: Shape Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several approaches to compute the topological derivative may be found in the literature. In particular, we proposed an alternative method based on classical shape sensitivity analysis (see [1,13,14,22,25,26,27] and references therein). This approach, called Topological-Shape Sensitivity Method, was already applied in the following two-dimensional problems:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simplicity we shall adopt as cost function the potential energy associated to the state equation (the total potential energy of the bar under analysis in the case of the kinematic formulation and the total complementary energy in the case of the static formulation). In fact, besides having a clear physical meaning, these cost functions simplify the calculation, Taroco et al (1998). We also assume that during the shape change of the transverse cross-section of the bar, the external actions, the torque (M t ) or the twist angle ( a) in each of the two formulations, remain unchanged.…”
Section: First Order Shape Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Equation (19), the partial derivatives with respect to the design variables and grid coordinates can be interchanged, yielding…”
Section: The Continuous Av Approach-first-order Sensitivitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%