2009
DOI: 10.1137/060673308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second Order Runge–Kutta Methods for Itô Stochastic Differential Equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The system of equations (7), (8) was solved using the stochastic Runge-Kutta method RI1 approximating multidimensional Wiener process Itô equations with weak order (3,2) [18]. Naturally, in numerical simulation the given system was reduced to the Itô form using the technique described in Appendix A.…”
Section: Results Of Simulation Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system of equations (7), (8) was solved using the stochastic Runge-Kutta method RI1 approximating multidimensional Wiener process Itô equations with weak order (3,2) [18]. Naturally, in numerical simulation the given system was reduced to the Itô form using the technique described in Appendix A.…”
Section: Results Of Simulation Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method of strong order 1 and weak order 1 has been considered in [4]. Using the approximation (20) from [31], a multi-dimensional derivative free version, denoted S-ROCK(1,1), can be obtained straightforwardly by replacing the last line in (37) by…”
Section: Weak Order One S-rock Methods [4]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we use the following approximation first proposed in [31] to construct efficient derivative free second order methods,…”
Section: Efficient Derivative Free Explicit Milstein-talay Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, we consider the following Runge-Kutta type scheme of weak order two, which is a derivative free version of the Milstein-Talay method [32] derived in [3, Lemma 3.1] using an idea in [28] to make the number of evaluations of each diffusion function g r , r = 1, . .…”
Section: A Test Problem With Non-commutative Noisementioning
confidence: 99%