2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-14812-6_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-Order Linear-Time Computability with Applications to Computable Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that Kawamura, Steinberg, and Thies [KST19] have defined linear-time computability for functions that are not necessarily Lipschitz. The restriction of their definition to the Lipschitz case is equivalent to our notion.…”
Section: Transducer Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note that Kawamura, Steinberg, and Thies [KST19] have defined linear-time computability for functions that are not necessarily Lipschitz. The restriction of their definition to the Lipschitz case is equivalent to our notion.…”
Section: Transducer Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly, every pointwise linear-time computable function is linear-time computable; our next goal is to explain why not every linear-time computable function f [D 2 ∩ [0, 1]] ⊆ Q is pointwise linear-time computable. As mentioned above, Kawamura, Steinberg, and Thies [KST19] have defined linear time computability for not necessarily Lipschitz functions. The idea is that the computation of f (x) with precision 2 −n uses only O(n) bits of x and takes only O(n) steps.…”
Section: Transducer Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation