2006
DOI: 10.1155/bvp/2006/23092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-order differential equations with deviating arguments

Abstract: This paper deals with boundary value problems for second-order differential equations with deviating arguments. Some sufficient conditions are formulated under which such problems have quasisolutions or a unique solution. A monotone iterative method is used. Examples with numerical results are added to illustrate the results obtained.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Zhou and Jiao [28] discussed the existence of extremal solutions for discontinuous fractional functional differential equations involving Caputo derivative and applied the hybrid fixed point methods to study such problems. However, both the results obtained in [11] and [28] hold only in finite dimensional spaces.…”
Section: ) F (T U(t)) = F (T U(t)) + G(t U(t)) + H(t U(t))mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Zhou and Jiao [28] discussed the existence of extremal solutions for discontinuous fractional functional differential equations involving Caputo derivative and applied the hybrid fixed point methods to study such problems. However, both the results obtained in [11] and [28] hold only in finite dimensional spaces.…”
Section: ) F (T U(t)) = F (T U(t)) + G(t U(t)) + H(t U(t))mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the other hand, the existence results of extremal solutions for fractional differential equations with deviating arguments involving Riemann-Liouville derivative has been reported by Jankowski [11]. To deal with the problem of the existence of extremal solutions, Jankowski applied the well known monotone iterative technique.…”
Section: ) F (T U(t)) = F (T U(t)) + G(t U(t)) + H(t U(t))mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, w(y 0 , z 0 ))) + 1 a g 1 (y 0 (0), w(y 0 , z 0 )) − 1 a g 1 (y 0 (0), w(y 0 , z 0 )) = y 0 (0) − z 0 (0) + 1 a (g 1 (y 0 (0), w(y 0 , z 0 )) − g 1 (y 0 (0), w(y 0 , z 0 ))) + 1 a (g 1 (z 0 (0), w(y 0 , z 0 ) − g 1 (y 0 (0), w(y 0 , z 0 ))) (7) and (8). By the same way we can show that p(T ) 0.…”
Section: Proof Letunclassified
“…Before, usually periodical boundary conditions where assumed, or like in [7] and [8] for functions g 1 and g 2 defined by The plan of this paper is as follows. In Sections 2 and 3 we introduce necessary tools and definitions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the functional dependence considered is the greatest integer function. In [16], the authors consider boundary value problems for second-order differential equations with deviating arguments and, in [17], the uniqueness issue is addressed for second-order linear functional differential equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%