1992
DOI: 10.3758/bf03327177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-order conditioning during sleep

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, the cellular excitability of thalamocortical systems is similar in PS and waking; cortical and thalamic neurons tend to oscillate in the fast frequency range (see, for review and discussion, Kahn, Pace-Schott, & Hobson, 1997; Llinás & Paré, 1991; Paré & Llinás, 1995; Steriade, 1991, 1995). Second, information-processing abilities in PS are attested by the fact that new associations can be formed during this state (Hennevin & Hars, 1992; Maho & Bloch, 1992). For example, pairing two nonawakening intracerebral stimulations during PS allowed the development of a cellular conditioned response in the hippocampus (Maho & Bloch, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the cellular excitability of thalamocortical systems is similar in PS and waking; cortical and thalamic neurons tend to oscillate in the fast frequency range (see, for review and discussion, Kahn, Pace-Schott, & Hobson, 1997; Llinás & Paré, 1991; Paré & Llinás, 1995; Steriade, 1991, 1995). Second, information-processing abilities in PS are attested by the fact that new associations can be formed during this state (Hennevin & Hars, 1992; Maho & Bloch, 1992). For example, pairing two nonawakening intracerebral stimulations during PS allowed the development of a cellular conditioned response in the hippocampus (Maho & Bloch, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal studies: Simple conditioning can be obtained in rats during PS, but not during SWS [180] using intracranial brain stimulation as conditioned (CS) and unconditioned (UCS) stimuli [180,181], and this conditioning can be transferred to the awake state [180]. Nevertheless, using a secondorder conditioning procedure, the pairing of nonawakening tone and electrotactile stimulations, leading to a lick suppression response to the tone, could be established both during SWS or PS as efficiently as during wakefulness [182]. Conversely, a heart response conditioned during wakefulness could be expressed during subsequent PS, and evoked discharges in the medial geniculate nucleus in response to a conditioned tone during wakefulness could be obtained at the same level during PS on CS tone presentation [183].…”
Section: Within-sleep Stimulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, there are some reports of lowered arousal threshold after a stimulus has acquired significance relative to when the stimulus is neutral (Ciancia, Trigona-Leisinger, & Bloch, 1980; Sano, Matsumoto, & Ishikawa, 1982; Siegel & Langley, 1965). Second, with a second-order conditioning paradigm, it was shown that during PS pairing an initially neutral tone with slight electrotactile stimulation to the ear that had been previously associated with footshock in aversive training induced fear response to the tone when it was subsequently presented to the awake animal (Hennevin & Hars, 1992). The fact that behavioral reactivity to the tone was changed after pairing in PS indicates that both stimuli were detected during this state of sleep.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%