1990
DOI: 10.1137/0727021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second-Order Absorbing Boundary Conditions for the Wave Equation: A Solution for the Corner Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
92
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earlier work was done by Bamberger et al [28] and Collino [29]. These approaches formulate the corner absorbers by deriving corner compatibility conditions, which are necessary to ensure the regularity of the solution of the problem when the data are smooth.…”
Section: Extension To Corner Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Earlier work was done by Bamberger et al [28] and Collino [29]. These approaches formulate the corner absorbers by deriving corner compatibility conditions, which are necessary to ensure the regularity of the solution of the problem when the data are smooth.…”
Section: Extension To Corner Regionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This truncation introduces error in the half-space stiffness, which can be measured with the help of the reflection coefficient (the ratio between the reflected and incident wave amplitudes at the computational boundary). For the sake of simplified presentation, the reflection coefficient is derived later in this section and is given by (28). Based on (28), note that perfect absorption is achieved when k x = 2i/L j .…”
Section: Continued Fraction Absorbing Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At Γ e , this equation is supplemented by second-order absorbing boundary conditions, as described in [2,8]. 2.2.…”
Section: Mathematical Problem Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the solution of ( 1.1 ) is smooth enough, an application of equation ( (1.2.iv) utt + uty -\uxx = 0 onY\xJ, which is given by Engquist and Majda [5], and earlier proposed by Claerbout [2]. Indeed, Engquist and Majda [6] and Bamberger, Joly, and Roberts [1] suggested modified forms of (1.2) to take into account corner instability. However, in this paper we shall use the boundary condition (1.2) or (l.l.ii) for simplicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%