Second malignancies after Hodgkin's disease: the Munich experience

Abstract

The occurrence of second malignancies (SM) is an important late event following the treatment of Hodgkin's disease (HD). We sought to determine the incidence, the risk factors, and the prognosis of SM in our population of patients with HD. A total of 1120 patients diagnosed with HD were registered at six participating institutions in Munich (calendar period 1974-1994). The mean follow-up for the development of SM was 9.1 years. A cumulative treatment score was calculated for both radio- and chemotherapy. The relative and absolute risks of SM were established. All SM were investigated for response to treatment and outcome. We observed 85 SM [eight leukemias, 22 non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL), two plasma cell neoplasias, and 53 solid tumors]. Five patients developed third malignancies. The relative risk of developing a second neoplasm was compared with that within the normal population and was 3.1-fold. The risk varied according to the category of SM. Higher relative risks (20.5 and 25.9-fold), but lower absolute risks were observed for leukemias and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Solid tumors had lower relative risks (1.8-fold). Splenectomy increased the risk of SM (relative risk 4.4-fold versus 2.7-fold). The risk of SM did not correlate with the initial treatment (radio- or chemotherapy) and did not decrease with prolonged follow-up. The cumulative intensity of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or the two modalities combined correlated with the risk of SM. Since some cases occurred early after diagnosis, not all second neoplasms can be considered treatment-associated. After 15 years, an actuarial risk of 11.7% was calculated for all SM, of 1.0% for leukemias, of 3.0% for NHL, and of 7.7% for solid tumors. The prognosis of SM varied between good (thyroid cancer, melanoma: median survival 5+ years), average (breast cancer, NHL), and poor (acute myeloid leukemias, lung cancers: median survival 9 months). With the exception of NHL, second cancers often occurred in topographic relation to the field of previous radiotherapy. Taken together, in our patient population, we observed all three categories of SM (solid tumors, leukemias, NHL). The risk for second leukemias is lower than in previous studies, whereas the risk of second NHL is somewhat higher. We confirm that splenectomy is a possible risk factor for SM. Even after correction for the age-specific cancer incidence, treatment intensity is associated with the development of second malignant tumors. Continued follow-up is mandatory after treatment for HD. Since the prognosis of most SM is unfavorable, early recognition and prevention are of the utmost importance.

Clinical Features of Multiple Primary Malignancies: a Retrospective Analysis of 72 Chinese Patients

“…Living habits may be an important contributing factor, such as unhealthy diet, tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption (Keshishian et al, 1998;Gursel et al, 2011), lack of exercise and so on. Not surprisingly, breast cancer was the most frequent first and second tumor among females in the present study, and consistent with the literature reported (Munker et al, 1999). Interestingly, a high association breast/breast cancer occurring together was observed.…”

Diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis of the foot and ankle treated with surgery and radiotherapy

“…Many studies have addressed the incidence of second malignancy after treatment for childhood cancers and common adult tumours [2,5,7,8]. These studies, whilst instructive for specific populations, should not necessarily be used to estimate risk for patients without malignant disease.…”

Successful matched unrelated BMT for secondary AML which developed simultaneously with relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma

“…This very rare case occurred 3 years after the end of initial therapy, a relatively long time when compared with previous studies. 1 Her cumulative intensity of cytotoxic drugs was smaller than the average intensity measured in previously reported cases, 8 but the previous irradiation might have increased the risk of developing secondary AML. Because her AML was more aggressive than the relapsed HL, we decided to give treatment for the secondary AML precedence over HL, and the patient successfully achieved CR in regard to both diseases.…”