2019
DOI: 10.15448/1984-4301.2019.4.34002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second language pragmatics: a corpus-based study of the pragmatic marker like

Abstract: This paper presents the extent to which like is used as a pragmatic marker (PM) by Brazilian university students living in Ireland. This is a case study which is part of a broader PhD research project on L2 pragmatic development within a study-abroad context. The results and reflections of this study are based on a sample corpus of spoken language, which comprises four 30-minute informal interactions between 6 participants and the researcher. Drawing on the Limerick Corpus of Irish English, a representative co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings indicate that the use of the pragmatic markers by ES learners varies by the learners' backgrounds. As suggested in previous research (Aijmer, 2011;Salas, 2022;Santos, 2019), more data should be compiled for further analysis.…”
Section: A Significant Differencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings indicate that the use of the pragmatic markers by ES learners varies by the learners' backgrounds. As suggested in previous research (Aijmer, 2011;Salas, 2022;Santos, 2019), more data should be compiled for further analysis.…”
Section: A Significant Differencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Jucker et al (2018), CP is one of the three empirical methodological approaches for the analysis of pragmatic phenomena (the others being experimentational pragmatics and observational pragmatics). What is more, PMs are perceived as one of the key areas of corpus-pragmatic research (Clancy and O'Keeffe 2015), which includes, but is not limited to, PMs across languages (see contributions in Aijmer and Simon-Vandenbergen 2006), in L2 (Veiga 2016;Santos 2019), and in comparisons between native and non-native speakers (Aijmer 2004;Fung and Carter 2007).…”
Section: Diy: a Bilingual Spoken Corpus For Corpus-pragmatic Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Öztürk and Köse, 2021; Pan and Aroonmanakun, 2022;Santos, 2019), as illustrated in Table1. Functions of the pm like identified in previous research…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%