2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second intercostal internal mammary artery perforator (IMAP) fasciocutaneous flap as an alternative choice for the treatment of deep sternal wound infections (DSWI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, IMAP flaps have been used to repair median sternotomy wounds, chest wall fistula, and upper abdominal wounds. 22 26 These studies confirm that the IMAP flap has stable vascularity and is useful. We believe that our method is a useful reconstruction method in cases of large keloids.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Indeed, IMAP flaps have been used to repair median sternotomy wounds, chest wall fistula, and upper abdominal wounds. 22 26 These studies confirm that the IMAP flap has stable vascularity and is useful. We believe that our method is a useful reconstruction method in cases of large keloids.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Another option for reconstruction of these defects is the fasciocutaneous flap based on perforator vessels from the internal thoracic artery, as described by Koulaxouzidis et al [ 15 ] . It is a less aggressive therapeutic option, associated with good aesthetic results and preservation of the breath muscles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, muscle‐sparing perforator flaps that are less invasive than muscle flaps have been developed for sternal defect closure (Koulaxouzidis, Orhun, Stavrakis, & Witzel, ; Mah et al, ; Wettstein et al, ). Because such flaps are fed by the superior epigastric artery or the internal thoracic artery, they cannot be used in patients who undergo harvesting of the internal thoracic artery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, muscle-sparing perforator flaps that are less invasive than muscle flaps have been developed for sternal defect closure (Koulaxouzidis, Orhun, Stavrakis, & Witzel, 2015;Mah et al, 2009;Wettstein et al, 2014). Because such flaps are fed by the superior epigastric artery or the internal thoracic artery, they cannot be used in protection to underlying vital structures following sternal debridement (Carlesimo et al, 2014), contact debrided tissues, contribute vascularity, and prevent bacterial growth (Banic, Ris, Erni, & Striffeler, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%