2008
DOI: 10.1155/2008/153280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second Hankel Determinant for a Class of Analytic Functions Defined by Fractional Derivative

Abstract: By making use of the fractional differential operator Ω λ z due to Owa and Srivastava, a class of analytic functions R λ α, ρ 0 ≤ ρ ≤ 1, 0 ≤ λ < 1, |α| < π/2 is introduced. The sharp bound for the nonlinear functional |a 2 a 4 − a 2 3 | is found. Several basic properties such as inclusion, subordination, integral transform, Hadamard product are also studied.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This lemma was also applied in [3] and [4] to find sharp bounds analogous as in Theorem 2.1 for the class of starlike functions of order α and of strongly starlike functions, respectively. Let now remark that the result of Theorem 2.1 can be achieved in a simple way by using Theorem 2.4 of [8] which particularly produces the following result: if p ∈ P is of the form (1.4) and µ ∈ [0, 1], then for n, m ∈ N, m < n, the following sharp estimate holds Theorem 2.4 can be found in [14] as Corollary 3.2. We reprove it by using the result below for the class R shown in [9].…”
Section: Sincementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This lemma was also applied in [3] and [4] to find sharp bounds analogous as in Theorem 2.1 for the class of starlike functions of order α and of strongly starlike functions, respectively. Let now remark that the result of Theorem 2.1 can be achieved in a simple way by using Theorem 2.4 of [8] which particularly produces the following result: if p ∈ P is of the form (1.4) and µ ∈ [0, 1], then for n, m ∈ N, m < n, the following sharp estimate holds Theorem 2.4 can be found in [14] as Corollary 3.2. We reprove it by using the result below for the class R shown in [9].…”
Section: Sincementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fixed q and n the growth problem is reduced to find the bound of the Hankel determinant over selected compact subclasses of A. Recently many authors examined the Hankel determinant H 2,2 (f ) of order 2 as well as the Hankel determinant H 3,1 (f ) of order 3 (see e.g., [9], [14], [11], [2] Given α ∈ [0, 1), by R(α) we denote a subclass of A of functions f such that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They discussed the second Hankel determinants for various classes of univalent functions. Some results in this direction can be found in [3][4][5]10,11]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The boundary of Ω 2 (T (λ)) consists of points (a 2 , a 3 , a 4 ) that correspond to the following functions:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second Hankel determinant for various subclasses of analytic functions were obtained by various authors. For details, (see [1,2,11,12,13,14,15,18]). Following the techniques devised by Libera and Zlotkiewicz (see [16,17]), in the present paper, the authors determine a sharp upper bound of the second Hankel determinant |H 2 (1)| for the function f belonging to the class S(λ, β, s, t).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%