2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10950-012-9290-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second generation of a rotational electrochemical seismometer using magnetohydrodynamic technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently the MET angular sensor is probably the only technology which commercially delivers highly sensitive rotational seismometers with a very low self-noise. Table 2 shows the key performances of current commercially available rotational seismometers (METR-03 and R2) [27,28]. …”
Section: Different Types Of Met Motion Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently the MET angular sensor is probably the only technology which commercially delivers highly sensitive rotational seismometers with a very low self-noise. Table 2 shows the key performances of current commercially available rotational seismometers (METR-03 and R2) [27,28]. …”
Section: Different Types Of Met Motion Sensormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ω h =R h S/2πRρ is the hydrodynamic frequency, above which transfer function of the mechanical system reduces proportionally to ω -1 [21]. In realistic parameters the hydrodynamic resistance defining the value of ω h for this system is so high that H mech (ω) transfer function decline begins at the frequency range of tens and even hundreds of Hz.…”
Section: Electrochemical Angular Motion Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In terms of the noise parameters of angular MET sensors, there is a number of publications with experimental data for several types of sensors and for various frequency ranges [ 17 , 18 , 19 ]. In particular, in [ 19 ], the distinction of noises for different types of sensors was connected with the distinction of their hydrodynamic resistance. This mechanism is apparently not the only one, which was especially proven in [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in [ 19 ], the distinction of noises for different types of sensors was connected with the distinction of their hydrodynamic resistance. This mechanism is apparently not the only one, which was especially proven in [ 19 ]. Unlike the mentioned works, in this study we made experimental measurements and generalized the model for a wider frequency range—from 0.01 to 200 Hz—which is, in fact, the complete frequency range of the modern applications of molecular electronic angular motion sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%