2017
DOI: 10.1097/inf.0000000000001481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Second- and Third-line Antiretroviral Therapy for Children and Adolescents

Abstract: We found no evidence comparing current World Health Organization-recommended second- and third-line ART regimens with regimens including drugs of interest: raltegravir, darunavir, etravirine and atazanavir. Randomized controlled trials or prospective cohort studies with comparator arms, and bridging studies, ideally conducted in resource-limited settings, are required to guide future recommendations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results signify the amount of ART exposure across multiple drug classes, either due to treatment failure or ART intolerances, thereby narrowing future therapeutic options throughout adulthood, and highlights the need for better access to newer antiretroviral agents in resource limited settings. 28 Given the move towards commencing cART on all children with PHIV as early as possible and the complexities in choosing subsequent cART regimens, 29 these figures, in conjunction with the association of receiving ≥2 nd cART and PHIVA mortality, highlights the importance of continuing evaluations on the durability and tolerability of 1 st -line cART options.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results signify the amount of ART exposure across multiple drug classes, either due to treatment failure or ART intolerances, thereby narrowing future therapeutic options throughout adulthood, and highlights the need for better access to newer antiretroviral agents in resource limited settings. 28 Given the move towards commencing cART on all children with PHIV as early as possible and the complexities in choosing subsequent cART regimens, 29 these figures, in conjunction with the association of receiving ≥2 nd cART and PHIVA mortality, highlights the importance of continuing evaluations on the durability and tolerability of 1 st -line cART options.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a recent systematic review showed that after undergoing enhanced adherence counselling upon detection of viremia, subsequent resuppression was achieved by a little over half (50.4%) of adults, but only 31.2 and 40.4% of children and adolescents, respectively [ 33 ]. Even among children whose ART regimen is switched to second-line, resuppression rates remain low [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an urgent need for evidence to inform the optimal management of children with virological failure, as well as to inform second- and third-line options for children in resource-limited settings. [ 26 ] As new antiretrovirals such as the integrase inhibitors dolutegravir and raltegravir become more widely accessible, giving children more treatment options, the use if LM as an initial strategy to manage virologic failure in children should be reconsidered. Our findings that adolescents were less likely to achieve virologic suppression on resumption of cART, highlights the challenge of managing treatment failure and maintaining life-long adherence in this vulnerable population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%