2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seawater-driven forward osmosis for enriching nitrogen and phosphorous in treated municipal wastewater: Effect of membrane properties and feed solution chemistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
48
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The membrane in FO process showed very high retention of PO 4 superior to 90% and 80 − 90% for K ions. These values are similar to those obtained in other FO experiments [13,23,24]. Nearly 30% of the IC passed through the membrane.…”
Section: Solute Diffusion Through the Membranesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The membrane in FO process showed very high retention of PO 4 superior to 90% and 80 − 90% for K ions. These values are similar to those obtained in other FO experiments [13,23,24]. Nearly 30% of the IC passed through the membrane.…”
Section: Solute Diffusion Through the Membranesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The surface charge was negative at pH higher than 3.5. The ABBM had a similar zeta potential distribution to the TFC membrane provided by HTI, except that the pH of lactic acid at C1, C2 and C3 was 4.3 ± 0.0, 2.9 ± 0.0 and 2.4 ± 0.0, respectively, the pH of the FS containing other selected solutes were all higher than 4.5. Therefore, when lactic acid was used as the solute in FS, the membrane surface is nearly electrically neutral or positively charged, while the membrane surface charge was negative when other selected solutes were used in the FS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The high performance of the CTA-227 FO membrane can be attributed to the electrostatic repulsion between the negatively charged 228 phosphate ions and the strong negative charge of the membrane at the working solution pH (i.e. 229 between pH of 8.0 -8.7) [20]. Steric hindrance (size exclusion) was also an important rejection 230 mechanism, since phosphate has a large hydrated radius.…”
Section: Forward Osmosis Membrane Nutrient Rejection 223mentioning
confidence: 99%