2020
DOI: 10.5194/hess-2020-105
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonally varied hillslope and groundwater contributions to streamflow in a glacial till and fractured sedimentary bedrock dominated Rocky Mountain watershed

Abstract: Whereas a lack of streamflow response to significant forest disturbance (e.g., forestry, wildfire, and insect infestation) has been observed at multiple locations in the Canadian Rocky Mountains, a region with sedimentary bedrock 10 overlain by glacial till, mechanisms governing this lack of change remain unclear. Some inferences can be drawn from conceptualizations of runoff generation (e.g., runoff thresholds and hydrologic connectivity) in physically similar watersheds, although much of the focus has been o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Streamflow percent increases in response to native forest restoration were highest at two catchments (RC5 and RC10) which had the least base flow, as indicated by low runoff ratios and high summer base flow sensitivity to variation in precipitation, whereas streamflow responses were lower at the restored catchment (RC11) which had the greatest base flow, as indicated by high runoff ratio and low summer base flow sensitivity to variation in precipitation (Figure 4, Table 3, Figure S6 in Data S1). These findings are consistent with other studies showing that catchment hydrology can moderate streamflow response to change in vegetation and climate (Spencer et al, 2020; Tague et al, 2008; Vose et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Streamflow percent increases in response to native forest restoration were highest at two catchments (RC5 and RC10) which had the least base flow, as indicated by low runoff ratios and high summer base flow sensitivity to variation in precipitation, whereas streamflow responses were lower at the restored catchment (RC11) which had the greatest base flow, as indicated by high runoff ratio and low summer base flow sensitivity to variation in precipitation (Figure 4, Table 3, Figure S6 in Data S1). These findings are consistent with other studies showing that catchment hydrology can moderate streamflow response to change in vegetation and climate (Spencer et al, 2020; Tague et al, 2008; Vose et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%