2003
DOI: 10.1198/073500103288619061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonality Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This descriptive evidence can be supported by formal statistical tests, such as the Canova -Hansen (1995) and Busetti and Harvey (2003) test, concerning the presence and the nature of the seasonal movements. A related issue is whether the responses are affected by the number of working days in the month and any other calender effect, such as the length of the month and Easter.…”
Section: Seasonalitymentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This descriptive evidence can be supported by formal statistical tests, such as the Canova -Hansen (1995) and Busetti and Harvey (2003) test, concerning the presence and the nature of the seasonal movements. A related issue is whether the responses are affected by the number of working days in the month and any other calender effect, such as the length of the month and Easter.…”
Section: Seasonalitymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Busetti and Harvey (2003) derive the locally best invariant test of the null that there is no seasonality against a permanent seasonal component, that can be either deterministic or stochastic, or both. The seasonal component is decomposed into a deterministic term, a linear combination with fixed coefficients of sines and cosines defined at the seasonal frequencies λ j = 2πj/s, j = 1...[s/2], where s is the number of seasons in a year (e.g.…”
Section: Seasonalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When seasonality is absent, unit root tests, see Dickey and Fuller (1979) and Phillips and Perron (1988), test the null of integration versus a stationary alternative see De Jong and Whiteman (1991), Koop (1992), Sims (1988), Sims and Uhlig (1991), Phillips (1991), Schotman and van Dijk (1991), Phillips and Perron (1994), among others, for the Bayesian approach to unit root testing; on the contrary, the tests proposed by Nyblom and Makelainen (1983) and Kwiatkowski et al (1992) test trend stationarity against the alternative of integration. Unit root tests were extended to the seasonal case by Hylleberg et al (1990), whereas the extension for stationarity tests was proposed by Canova and Hansen (1995), and Busetti and Harvey (2003). Other important references on whether seasonality is stochastically evolving over time include Hylleberg and Pagan (1997) and Koop and van Dijk (2000).…”
Section: Bayesian Stochastic Specification Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One approach is performing the class of seasonal unit root tests proposed by Hylleberg et al (1990), which is based on the finite autoregressive representation of the series and tests for the presence of roots with unit modulus and zero or seasonal phase in the autoregressive polynomial. An alternative approach is to carry out the stationarity tests proposed by Canova and Hansen (1995) and extended by Busetti and Harvey (2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%