1988
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1988.mp50004002.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SEASONALITY AND THE ORDER OF INTEGRATION FOR CONSUMPTION*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 251 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(21 reference statements)
2
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tests were performed using the log transformation of the data and their results can be found on the website cited in the introduction. We applied the Osborn et al (1988) tests, hereafter OCSB, and Hylleberg et al (1990) test as extended in Beaulieu and Miron (1993), hereafter HEGY. Using the terminology employed in the first paper, I(r,s) -where r and s can take values one or zero-means that the data needs r regular differences and s annual differences in order to be stationary.…”
Section: Trend and Seasonal Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tests were performed using the log transformation of the data and their results can be found on the website cited in the introduction. We applied the Osborn et al (1988) tests, hereafter OCSB, and Hylleberg et al (1990) test as extended in Beaulieu and Miron (1993), hereafter HEGY. Using the terminology employed in the first paper, I(r,s) -where r and s can take values one or zero-means that the data needs r regular differences and s annual differences in order to be stationary.…”
Section: Trend and Seasonal Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 The AR terms represent dependence on past time-series values and the MA terms represent dependence on past errors (e.g., noise); detailed explanations of this statistical technique are found elsewhere. 18 The order of seasonal and nonseasonal differencing needed to achieve stationarity of the series was determined using the OCSB test 19 and KPSS test, 20 respectively, and validated by visual inspection of the autocorrelation function (ACF) and partial autocorrelation (PACF) plots. A SARIMA model was then obtained by finding the parameters that yielded the smallest Akaike Information Criterion 21 (AIC) among all possible models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, both the trend and seasonal differencing parameters are taken care of by performing unit root tests beforehand [49], i.e. the Augmented Dickey-Fuller test [15] and the Osborn-Chui-Smith-Birchenhall test [51]. The following steps form the procedure of the hybrid model, which is adjusted for a holdout sample test process.…”
Section: The Profarima Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the two differencing terms need to be considered, as the correct identification of the other terms can only be achieved for a stationary time series. The addition of both trend and seasonal differencing is typically decided on by performing unit root tests, such as the Augmented Dickey-Fuller test [15] and the Osborn-Chui-Smith-Birchenhall test [51] respectively. Further model identification can then be done by utilizing expert knowledge or by comparing models using several evaluation criteria.…”
Section: Arima Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%