1954
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0330519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal Variations in Quality of Eggs as Measured by Physical and Functional Properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1958
1958
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above results, advocating a significant age effect on yolk index, are partly supported by Sauter et al (1954), who found a significant but slight seasonal decline in yolk index. Moreover, Table 1 indicates that this age effect is independent of the effect of egg size, and this may be the reason that Wolk et al (1952) failed to obtain any additional benefit from correlating yolk index with egg weight in a proposed measure called " yolk factor ".…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above results, advocating a significant age effect on yolk index, are partly supported by Sauter et al (1954), who found a significant but slight seasonal decline in yolk index. Moreover, Table 1 indicates that this age effect is independent of the effect of egg size, and this may be the reason that Wolk et al (1952) failed to obtain any additional benefit from correlating yolk index with egg weight in a proposed measure called " yolk factor ".…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…2 All measures were tested after a storage period of o, 24, 48, 96 and 192 hours at 32° C. McLaren, 1954;Johnson and Merritt, 1955;Funk et al, 1958). However, Jeffrey (1941) demonstrated that albumen index of new-laid eggs was a function of age of bird between the ages of 9-18 months, and was independent of the temperature prevailing while the egg was being formed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
N UMEROUS reports indicate that albumen quality declines more or less steadily throughout the first laying year (Sauter et al, 1954;Strain and Johnson, 1957;Froning and Funk, 1958;May and Stadelman, 1960;Mueller et al, 1960). The consensus of opinion is that this change is not related to seasonal changes in temperature.
…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Lorenz and Almquist (1936) observed that high environmental temperature depresses egg size but the percentage of firm white and shell weight remains unchanged. Sauter et al (1954) reported there was a consistent seasonal decline in the physical quality of eggs from spring to summer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%