2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal variations in composite riverbank stability in the Lower Jingjiang Reach, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
36
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The construction of revetment engineering for more than half a century has indicated that large‐scale bank‐erosion processes have not occurred in the study reach, especially after the construction of important submerged bank‐protection works, and these bank‐protection works restrict effectively the channel widening processes in local regions. However, remarkable channel degradation has still caused significant bank retreat at several local sites that have no revetment protection (Yu and Lu, ; Xia et al ., , c; Cao and Wang, ). Statistics of cross‐sectional profiles surveyed in 2002–2014 indicate that severe bank retreat occurred at these local sites around Jing34, Jing60, Jing98 and Jing133, as shown in Figure (b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The construction of revetment engineering for more than half a century has indicated that large‐scale bank‐erosion processes have not occurred in the study reach, especially after the construction of important submerged bank‐protection works, and these bank‐protection works restrict effectively the channel widening processes in local regions. However, remarkable channel degradation has still caused significant bank retreat at several local sites that have no revetment protection (Yu and Lu, ; Xia et al ., , c; Cao and Wang, ). Statistics of cross‐sectional profiles surveyed in 2002–2014 indicate that severe bank retreat occurred at these local sites around Jing34, Jing60, Jing98 and Jing133, as shown in Figure (b).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is widely accepted that bank erosion is the result of a set of complex natural processes that depend on in‐channel hydrodynamic conditions and bank soil properties, which are both highly variable within a single river and between rivers, however, it is difficult to predict the process of bank erosion or the variation in bankfull width using simple relations (Thorne et al ., ; ASCE Task Committee, ; Piégay et al ., ; Bartley et al ., ; Xia et al ., , c). Repeated measurements of cross‐sectional profiles show that the left bank profile at Jing34 remained unchanged from 2002 to 2014, while the right bank retreated continuously over the same period (Figure (a)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the cohesive upper soil in the UJR, an empirical relationship between critical shear stress (τ c ), the bulk density of the soil (γ s ), and the mean median diameter of the cohesive soil ( d 50 ) can be written as τc=1/77.5×[]3.2()γsγwd50+a/d50 where γ s = 2.72 kN/m 3 for the low‐liquid‐limit clay; γ w is the bulk density of water; d 50 = 0.008 mm for the cohesive upper soil; and a is an empirical coefficient equalling 2.842 × 10 −4 N/m according to the statistics of incipient motion for clay in the Jingjiang Reach (Xia, Zong, Deng, et al, ). The critical shear stress calculated using Equation was 0.50 N/m 2 for the cohesive upper soil, which was used in the following calculations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies utilized the hydrological model, historical map and field survey methods to analyze the hydrological regime change in the LJR. These studies mainly focused on certain aspects, such as the flow and sediment [20][21][22][23], bank erosion and stability [24,25], river channel pattern [19,26] and hydrological effect between rivers and lakes [27,28]. The annual average sediment load at Yichang and Jianli stations in the post-dam period (2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007) was reduced by 74% and 84%, respectively, compared with the pre-dam period [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%