2003
DOI: 10.1093/plankt/25.7.843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal variations in abundance, development and vertical distribution of Calanus finmarchicus, C. hyperboreus andC. glacialis in the East Icelandic Current

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may indicate that spawning of C. finmarchicus occurred later in the offshore areas south and west of Iceland compared with the other areas. This compares well with earlier findings, namely that the spring spawning is delayed with increasing distance from shore off the south and west coasts (Gislason & Astthorsson 1996;Gislason 2003), while this is not as evident in the subarctic waters off the north and northeast coasts (Gislason & Astthorsson 1998;Astthorsson & Gislason 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This may indicate that spawning of C. finmarchicus occurred later in the offshore areas south and west of Iceland compared with the other areas. This compares well with earlier findings, namely that the spring spawning is delayed with increasing distance from shore off the south and west coasts (Gislason & Astthorsson 1996;Gislason 2003), while this is not as evident in the subarctic waters off the north and northeast coasts (Gislason & Astthorsson 1998;Astthorsson & Gislason 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The southern populations of C. glacialis and C. hyperboreus have probably been isolated from their main arctic populations for a very long time, which would facilitate evolutionary adaptations to their contrasting environments. Calanus finmarchicus and P. norvegica have more widespread distribution (Longhurst 2007), with populations in arctic waters more likely being influenced by gene flow from Atlantic waters (Astthorsson and Gislason 2003;Parent et al 2011), which might tend to counteract evolutionary adaptation to cold water. Consistent with this line of reasoning, the arctic and southern populations of the two latter species differed less in body size, possibly more influenced by phenotypic plasticity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These genera form a central node in the structure and function of Arctic epipelagic ecosystems during spring and summer and have accordingly been the focus of most studies of Arctic zooplankton population dynamics. Most of these studies have focused primarily on processes governing population growth such as feeding (Båmstedt et al 1991, Turner et al 2001, egg production (Hirche 1989, Hirche et al 1997, Niehoff et al 2002, egg hatching or larval stage development (Astthorsson & Gislason 2003). All of these processes are equally important determinants of development of any population; however, the size of populations is determined not only by processes leading to increases, but also by mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%