Seasonal variation of nutrient loads in treated wastewater effluents and receiving water bodies in Sedibeng and Soshanguve, South Africa

Abstract

The discharge of inadequately treated wastewater effluent presents a major threat to the aquatic environment and public health worldwide. As a water-scarce country, South Africa is facing an alarming situation since most of its wastewater discharges are not meeting the permissible limit. The aim of this study was to assess the physicochemical quality of treated wastewater effluents and their impact on receiving water bodies. During the study period, pH, temperature, free chlorine residue (Cl(-)), dissolved oxygen (DO), nitrate (NO3 (-1)), orthophosphate (PO4 (-3)) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) were measured in order to ascertain whether the selected wastewater systems in Sedibeng and Soshanguve complied with the South African and World Health Organization standards during wet and dry seasons. These parameters were analysed for samples collected from raw wastewater influent, treated wastewater effluent and receiving water bodies. The study was carried out between August 2011 and May 2012, and samples were collected on a weekly basis during both seasons. The physicochemical quality of effluents did not comply with the regulatory limits set by South Africa in terms of pH in Meyerton, Rietgat and Sandspruit (pH 7.6 to 8.1); free chlorine in Sandspruit (0.27 ± 0.05 mg/L); nitrate in Leeuwkuil and Rietgat (2.1 and 3.8 mg/L, respectively) during the wet season; orthophosphate in Meyerton during the wet season and in Sandspruit during the dry season (1.3 mg PO4 (-3) as P/L and 1.1 mg PO4 (-3) as P/L, respectively); and chemical oxygen demand in Rietgat during the dry season and in Sandspruit during the wet season (75.5 and 35 mg/L, respectively). Furthermore, the quality of the receiving water bodies did not comply with the South African standards recommended for pH, chemical oxygen demand and orthophosphate and DO (5 mg/L) in Rietgat during the wet season. The geometric mean of the water quality index values ranged between 32.4 and 36.9 for the effluent samples and between 38.1 and 65.7 for the receiving water bodies. These findings revealed that the receiving water bodies were classified as having "poor" quality status, except Leeuwkuil receiving water body (Vaal River) and Sandspruit upstream (Sandspruit stream). The dry season showed a relatively lower water quality index. This situation might be attributed to the higher amount of organic matter and lower microbial activities in the receiving water bodies. This study suggests that wastewater effluents and receiving water systems should be monitored regularly to ensure best practices with regard to nutrient treatment and discharge of wastewater.

Assessing the Effect of Irrigation with Reclaimed Water Using Different Irrigation Techniques on Tomatoes Quality Parameters

“…[64] reported that tomatoes under irrigation with TW achieved higher yields than plants irrigated with tap water. This increase in production can be because the RW consider a steady water source that can supply a large amount of nutrients [65,66]. Moreover, the result agreed with Ref.…”

“…The results further illustrate that the VC of the tomato fruit was increased under the water-saving treatments. This implies that water stress can affect tomato fruit VC content positively, as observed by findings of [49,[57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74]. They proved that the VC of tomato fruit was higher under the conditions of limited soil water.…”

Impact of Long-Term Reclaimed Water Irrigation on the Distribution of Potentially Toxic Elements in Soil: An In-Situ Experiment Study in the North China Plain

“…Overuse and extensive exploitation of groundwater have led to water shortage issues and frequent drought events [5,6], which promote reclaimed water reuse worldwide [7]. Reclaimed water is a stable water source which can contribute a huge quantity of nutrients [8,9] and its reuse in agriculture can significantly increase crop production [10]. It was estimated in a report that about 20 million ha of farmland was irrigated with reclaimed water and the amount would increase dramatically in the next few decades due to the intensive water crisis [11].…”

Wastewater irrigation: past, present, and future

“…The presence of parasitic worms and enriched heavy metals in food can likely spread diseases . Wastewater irrigation can also lead to soil hardening, heavy metals enrichment, and shallow groundwater pollution if used directly without pretreatment.…”