2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00756.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal restrictions of bud growth on roots of Cirsium arvense and Sonchus arvensis and rhizomes of Elymus repens

Abstract: SummaryThe success of weed management aimed at depleting the regenerative structures of perennial weeds depends largely on the sprouting activity of rhizome and root buds. Seasonal variation in sprouting of these buds on Cirsium arvense, Sonchus arvensis and Elymus repens was studied for plants collected from Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden. At 2-week intervals from July to October, 5-cm fragments of roots or rhizomes were cut from plants grown in buckets and planted into soil in pots, half of which were p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
57
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Insignificant or varying responses of C. arvense to shallow post-harvest cultivations or cover-crop growing have also been observed in other studies (e.g., Brandsaeter et al, 2011;Melander et al, 2012). Brandsaeter et al (2010) and Tørresen et al (2010) infer that post-harvest measures against C. arvense populations showing little or varying readiness of adventive buds on roots to sprout in late summer and autumn would have a limited effect since innate bud dormancy makes it difficult to exhaust the carbohydrate reserves in the roots. The rather intensive handpulling of C. arvense in this study is another aspect likely to have masked any effects of the post-harvest treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Insignificant or varying responses of C. arvense to shallow post-harvest cultivations or cover-crop growing have also been observed in other studies (e.g., Brandsaeter et al, 2011;Melander et al, 2012). Brandsaeter et al (2010) and Tørresen et al (2010) infer that post-harvest measures against C. arvense populations showing little or varying readiness of adventive buds on roots to sprout in late summer and autumn would have a limited effect since innate bud dormancy makes it difficult to exhaust the carbohydrate reserves in the roots. The rather intensive handpulling of C. arvense in this study is another aspect likely to have masked any effects of the post-harvest treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This is probably due to the higher presence of C. arvense and T. farfara, as opposed to E. repens, in experiment 2. The two dicotyledonous perennials are known to grow less readily in late summer and autumn than E. repens (Brandsaeter et al, 2010;Tørresen et al, 2010). Depleting the carbohydrates in the roots of C. arvense and rhizomes of T. farfara is probably less pronounced as compared to E. repens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C. arvense is sensitive to deep tillage whilst the effect of shallow cultivations may vary (Brandsaeter et al, 2011a(Brandsaeter et al, , 2011bOlsen, 2011). Brandsaeter et al (2010) and Tørresen et al (2010) inferred that cultivations against perennials with low readiness of buds to sprout in late summer and autumn (e.g. S. arvensis) would have limited effect since innate bud dormancy makes exhaustion of the carbohydrate reserves in the roots impossible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weed species may cause severe crop yield losses and has become an increasing problem as the use of herbicides is reduced (Bacher et al 1997;Salonen et al 2001;Salonen & Hyvönen 2002;Brandsaeter et al 2010). To effectively control this weed with other measures, mainly mechanical, the predictions of the behaviour of the weed in relation to climate and the cultivated crop are essential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%