A Companion to Theoretical Econometrics 2003
DOI: 10.1002/9780470996249.ch32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal Nonstationarity and Near‐Nonstationarity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This has led over the years to the development of numerous unit root tests; see, for instance, Stock (1994), Maddala and Kim (1998) and Phillips and Xiao (1998) for extensive reviews. A similar phenomenon has also been observed in the context of seasonally unadjusted economic time series; see, for instance, Ghysels and Osborn (2001) and Ghysels et al (2000) for overviews.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This has led over the years to the development of numerous unit root tests; see, for instance, Stock (1994), Maddala and Kim (1998) and Phillips and Xiao (1998) for extensive reviews. A similar phenomenon has also been observed in the context of seasonally unadjusted economic time series; see, for instance, Ghysels and Osborn (2001) and Ghysels et al (2000) for overviews.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Y t is a stationary and invertible ARMA process of the type described by equations (3) [13]. The simplest seasonal model for non-stationary variables is the seasonal random walk (SRW): Y t = Y t-S + ε t .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(12) represents an ECM where 7 The HEGY test implies if one concludes a seasonal series is stationary by rejecting the three hypotheses it is equivalent to testing and rejecting the overall hypothesis π 1 = π 2 = π 3 = π 4 at the same significance level. Ghysels, Osborn and Rodrigues (2001) perceive a problem with this. Using the same significance level for each of the three mutually exclusive HEGY tests, does not imply the same level of significance for the overall test.…”
Section: Cointegration and Ecm Testingmentioning
confidence: 91%