2010
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal Influenza Vaccine and Protection against Pandemic (H1N1) 2009-Associated Illness among US Military Personnel

Abstract: IntroductionA novel A/H1N1 virus is the cause of the present influenza pandemic; vaccination is a key countermeasure, however, few data assessing prior seasonal vaccine effectiveness (VE) against the pandemic strain of H1N1 (pH1N1) virus are available.Materials and MethodsSurveillance of influenza-related medical encounter data of active duty military service members stationed in the United States during the period of April–October 2009 with comparison of pH1N1-confirmed cases and location and date-matched con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was high in persons 40 (55%) or 25 (50%) years of age but very low in persons 25-39 years of age ( 10%). 7 These findings correlate with the high levels of cross-reactive 2009 pH1N1 antibodies reported here, with 30% in the 1960-1965 cohort (age range = 35-48) but only 4% in the 1972-1977 cohort (age range = 23-36). Our findings are similar to the results found recently in an elderly population in the United States.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…Vaccine effectiveness (VE) was high in persons 40 (55%) or 25 (50%) years of age but very low in persons 25-39 years of age ( 10%). 7 These findings correlate with the high levels of cross-reactive 2009 pH1N1 antibodies reported here, with 30% in the 1960-1965 cohort (age range = 35-48) but only 4% in the 1972-1977 cohort (age range = 23-36). Our findings are similar to the results found recently in an elderly population in the United States.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…infection with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 is uncertain, and a range of estimates have been made, which range from indicating protection, [10][11][12][13] to no effect, [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] to increased susceptibility. [24][25][26] A recent meta-analysis found that prior receipt of seasonal influenza vaccination may have been associated with moderate protection against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 However, the observational design of the Canadian study, like the present one, means that the association may be due to confounding or bias. 39 A protective effect of seasonal vaccination against influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 infection has been demonstrated in observational studies from Mexico, Argentina, and the US; [10][11][12][13] while other observational studies, 15,16,40 and a randomised controlled trial, 14 have shown no association. A 2012 meta-analysis including 13 studies found no association, but when studies judged to have a moderate or high risk of bias were excluded from the analysis (leaving eight studies), a protective effect on laboratoryconfirmed infection was observed.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NC/99 virus was continuously used in seasonal influenza vaccines for several years. Recent reports of surveillance data indicated that at least partial levels of protection against the recent pandemic H1N1 virus are associated with prior vaccination with seasonal influenza vaccines (16,25). Since in our hands there was no observed neutralization activity or protection by sera from NC/99-primed mice against CA/E3/09 virus, we speculate that the general population having previously received seasonal influenza vaccines containing NC/99 virus could possibly harbor some level of T-cell immunity that might help to reduce disease severity during 2009 pandemic influenza infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%