2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal influence on cone penetration test: An unsaturated soil site example

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
15

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“… The appearance characteristics of land points and test sample 34 . ( a ) Land points; ( b ) field soil samples; ( c ) test sample; ( d ) soil sample in experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… The appearance characteristics of land points and test sample 34 . ( a ) Land points; ( b ) field soil samples; ( c ) test sample; ( d ) soil sample in experiment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, relative densities were back‐calculated from the tip resistance and mean effective stress measurements using the empirical equation of Yang and Russell 46 (see Table 2). The results for the unsaturated São Paulo sand were derived from the field CPT tests carried out in a tropical site located at the São Paulo State University 51 . In these tests, elastic shear moduli and friction angles reported by Giacheti et al 51 .…”
Section: Numerical Model Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also proposed a new methodology to determine the effective stress in unsaturated soils from CPT using the soil behaviour type index 50 . Giacheti et al 51 . investigated the field measurements of CPT in an unsaturated clayey sand and indicated significant influence of suction variation owing to seasonal changes on the CPT results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of tropical weather can lead to variations in the in-situ soil suction since it features high annual temperatures with wet summers and dry winters. The seasonal variation's influence on soil suction can lead to significant changes in the in-situ test data, as discussed by Giacheti et al (2019) based on CPT data. Figure 2 shows the soil profile together with dry unit weight (g d ), void ratio (e) and Atterberg limits (w L and w P ) of the studied site up to 12 m depth.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to consider seasonal variability in these soil sites caused by soil suction, which is related to the water content through a soil-water retention curve (SWRC). Therefore, the behavior of unsaturated soils cannot be considered without taking into account soil suction (y) and the site variability (Giacheti et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%