2010
DOI: 10.3354/meps08536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal growth variation in Chlamys islandica (Bivalvia) from sub-Arctic Greenland is linked to food availability and temperature

Abstract: In order to assess the role of different environmental parameters in the population dynamics of marine invertebrates in the Arctic, we examined seasonal variation in individual biomass, shell growth, and mass production of somatic and reproductive tissues of immature and maturing scallops Chlamys islandica suspended in culture nets at 15 and 30 m depth in SW Greenland from May 2007 to October 2008. All 3 parameters varied both seasonally and between depths. Individual shell growth rate and biomass were poor pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By including scallop SH, the model fit was improved (Table 1, Model II), indicating that G m decreases with increasing individual size. This was expected (Blicher et al 2010), and the inclusion of SH in Model II (Table 1) can be regarded as a simple correction for this size dependence. However, the large fraction of unexplained variation and the significant autocorrelation of the residuals seemed to indicate that RD explained the seasonal cycle in the mass growth rate of Chlamys islandica poorly.…”
Section: Rd and Mass Growth Ratementioning
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By including scallop SH, the model fit was improved (Table 1, Model II), indicating that G m decreases with increasing individual size. This was expected (Blicher et al 2010), and the inclusion of SH in Model II (Table 1) can be regarded as a simple correction for this size dependence. However, the large fraction of unexplained variation and the significant autocorrelation of the residuals seemed to indicate that RD explained the seasonal cycle in the mass growth rate of Chlamys islandica poorly.…”
Section: Rd and Mass Growth Ratementioning
confidence: 77%
“…In the following text we refer to condition and mass growth in terms of total tissue mass. Blicher et al (2010) (n = 502, R 2 = 0.94, p < 0.001)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that values are approximate as they rely on general assumptions regarding the organic C:AFDW ratio and the allometric relationship between biomass and disc diameter to make data directly comparable. Moreover, a general relationship such as this does not consider the potential seasonal variation in macrobenthic activity, which has been reported in other studies in polar areas (Brockington & Clarke 2001, Blicher et al 2010). However, it can be used to produce a preliminary estimate of the carbon requirements of this abundant taxon in the Arctic using a more general approach based on size structure and abundance, which can be effectively described using sea-floor images.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…3), and it thus resembles many other bivalves in this respect (e.g., C. islandica, Greenland [Blicher et al 2010];S. calcifer, Gulf of California [Cudney-Bueno and Rowell 2008]; P. magellanicus [Wahle and Jumars 2014]).…”
Section: Reproductive Featuresmentioning
confidence: 98%