2009
DOI: 10.1175/2009jcli2990.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal Effects of Indian Ocean Freshwater Forcing in a Regional Coupled Model*

Abstract: Effects of freshwater forcing from river discharge into the Indian Ocean on oceanic vertical structure and the Indian monsoons are investigated using a fully coupled, high-resolution, regional climate model. The effect of river discharge is included in the model by restoring sea surface salinity (SSS) toward observations. The simulations with and without this effect in the coupled model reveal a highly seasonal influence of salinity and the barrier layer (BL) on oceanic vertical density stratification, which i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, CFSv2 displays a positive bias in freshwater flux during fall, which is responsible for the positive surface salinity bias (Figure 2k). Consistent with other coupled model studies, precipitation in the atmospheric component of CFSv2 contains strong biases, with overestimation of evaporation resulting in poor representation of surface salinity in the BoB (e.g., Seo et al, 2009). MOM5 displays a weak bias in E−P, which is reflected in a weak positive bias in surface salinity ( Figures 4c and 2e).…”
Section: Inc-godas (Ocean Model Is Mom4)supporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, CFSv2 displays a positive bias in freshwater flux during fall, which is responsible for the positive surface salinity bias (Figure 2k). Consistent with other coupled model studies, precipitation in the atmospheric component of CFSv2 contains strong biases, with overestimation of evaporation resulting in poor representation of surface salinity in the BoB (e.g., Seo et al, 2009). MOM5 displays a weak bias in E−P, which is reflected in a weak positive bias in surface salinity ( Figures 4c and 2e).…”
Section: Inc-godas (Ocean Model Is Mom4)supporting
confidence: 84%
“…However, factors responsible for such salinity biases in the BoB (both in the surface and in the subsurface) are unclear and need examination. Biases in subsurface salinity and temperature in GCMs can alter the ocean circulation, sea level, vertical mixing, and the coupling between ocean and atmosphere (e.g., Seo et al, 2009;Brown et al, 2013 Ravichandran et al, 2013; a data assimilation product; see Table 1 for details). This article describes details of different models and data sets used in the study, provides insights into salinity biases in the BoB vertical structure and associated processes, and discusses thoughts for future work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gopalakrishna et al, 1988;Prasad, 2004;Narvekar and Prasanna Kumar, 2006). A major conclusion of these studies was that wind-driven mixing and net heat flux largely controlled the seasonal cycle of mixed layer depth in the open Bay of Bengal (see Kirthi et al, 2012, and the references therein), while fresh water flux driven stratification was important in the northern Bay of Bengal during summer monsoon (Han et al, 2001;Shenoi et al, 2002;Anitha et al, 2008;Seo et al, 2009). The present study explored the role of Rossby wave propagation and advection of high salinity Arabian Sea waters in regulating the basin-wide mixed layer depth, in addition to the fluxes of heat and fresh water.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows to distinguish the effects of local versus remote 84 forcings on the ISM (Seo et al 2009, Samala et al 2013, to test the sensitivity of the 85 simulated ISM to different physical parameterizations (Mukhopadhyay et al 2010, 86 Srinivas et al 2013, Samson et al 2014 or to prescribe the orography in a more 87 realistic way (Ma et al 2014). But despite those specificities, significant biases still 88 exist in terms of precipitation and surface temperature (Lucas-Picher et al 2011), 89 which suggest that high resolution is not the unique missing ingredient in order to 90 improve ISM rainfall in current CGCMs and RCMs.…”
Section: Introduction 61 62mentioning
confidence: 99%