2011
DOI: 10.1198/tech.2011.09050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seasonal Dynamic Factor Analysis and Bootstrap Inference: Application to Electricity Market Forecasting

Abstract: Year-ahead forecasting of electricity prices is an important issue in the current context of electricity markets. Nevertheless, only one-day-ahead forecasting is commonly tackled up in previous published works. Moreover, methodology developed for the short-term does not work properly for long-term forecasting.In this paper we provide a seasonal extension of the Non-Stationary Dynamic Factor Analysis, to deal with the interesting problem (both from the economic and engineering point of view) of long term foreca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
46
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the length of the historic dataset, the shortest window is preferred for the forecasting horizons of one and seven-days-ahead (forecasts for the short term), while the long window of 1.5 years is preferred for the forecasting horizons of 30-and 60-days-ahead (long-term forecasts); this is consistent with the results in [5]. Furthermore, the MA terms for the factor models are statistically significant for all forecasting horizons, which means that modeling the common factors as ARMA reduces the error in comparison to modeling them as AR.…”
Section: Summarizing the Conclusion From The Anovassupporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the length of the historic dataset, the shortest window is preferred for the forecasting horizons of one and seven-days-ahead (forecasts for the short term), while the long window of 1.5 years is preferred for the forecasting horizons of 30-and 60-days-ahead (long-term forecasts); this is consistent with the results in [5]. Furthermore, the MA terms for the factor models are statistically significant for all forecasting horizons, which means that modeling the common factors as ARMA reduces the error in comparison to modeling them as AR.…”
Section: Summarizing the Conclusion From The Anovassupporting
confidence: 79%
“…To summarize, a key stage when estimating this kind of model is the selection of the number of common factors, r, as well as the model they follow, which implies selecting the orders: p, d, q, P, D, Q. r could be obtained using the test proposed in [11] and could also be selected such that diagnostic checking results (specific factors and errors of the observation equation must be uncorrelated between them, and specific factors without any cross correlation) are reasonable [5]. However, alternative values could satisfy these criteria.…”
Section: Dynamic Factor Model (Dfm)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We shall denote this type of fms by L1FM in the forecasting exercise. This model was extended to the non-stationary case by Poncela (2004 y 2006) and Lam, Yao and Bathia (2011), while seasonal dynamic fms were analysed in Alonso and others (2011).…”
Section: Factor Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%